Skip to main content

Old prejudice dies hard: Why the Left still doesn't trust NGOs

Decades ago, when I was a student at Delhi University, the Left-wing student organisations, one of which I was a part of, would hold a highly negative view of NGOs. They would go so far as to castigate them as imperialist or CIA agents -- just because they were foreign-funded, by bodies such as Amnesty, Oxfam, Human Rights Watch, and Greenpeace.
The view reflected what the leaders of the two Communist parties -- CPI and CPI-M -- would take. The reason seemed simple to them: the foreign organisations that funded the NGOs were critical of human rights records in the then Soviet Union and China. Guided by their foreign "supporters", both Communist parties opposed NGOs.
I too would take a somewhat negative view of NGOs until I came to Ahmedabad in 1993 to join the Times of India as assistant editor. Among those I first met to acclimatise myself with Gujarat's socio-political life were intellectuals and activists. I found that, contrary to what the Communist leaders thought, NGOs had a huge reserve of information to help me as a journalist -- something the Communists couldn't even fathom.
Among those who became central to guiding me were Achyut Yagnik, Martin Macwan, Gagan Sethi, Hanif Lakdawala, Prafull Trivedi, Sukhdev Patel, Nafisa Barot, and Anil Patel. Their deep understanding of different aspects of Gujarat's society -- and even its politics -- surprised me. Frankly, it is they who made me aware of casteism and communalism. For the first time I began seeing things beyond class struggle.
The reason I write this piece is that a recent article penned and distributed by a global Left-wing communications network appears to suggest that the Left across the globe has not yet fully shed its dislike for NGOs. The article claims that the answer to the rise of the ultra-right wave in Asia is "not the liberal politics that have been sold by the Western-funded NGOs and think tanks that for decades have portrayed themselves as the vanguards of democracy against fascism."
While this article does not declare NGOs imperialist or CIA agents, it seems the author, at the back of his mind, thinks exactly that. Let me quote the article: "Indeed, they (NGOs and think tanks) are, in the best case, completely ineffective, and in the worst case actively harmful."
Ironically, the ultra-right is now barring foreign funds to NGOs, calling them anti-national. And, in the United States, the foreign donors who had funded our NGOs are under scanner. I wonder what the Left has to say about this.

Comments

TRENDING

Frontline heroes, marginalized citizens: How Dalit ASHA workers face caste discrimination

A comprehensive investigative report published by BehanBox and authored by Sarasvati Thuppadolla reveals the pervasive, systemic caste-based discrimination faced by Dalit Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHA) across rural India. Even though India’s one million ASHA workers were collectively honored by the World Health Organization with the Global Health Leaders Award in 2022 for their pivotal role in reducing maternal and infant mortality, their marginalized caste identity frequently dictates the harsh terms of their acceptance by the communities they serve. 

‘Supplementary at best': Ex-Union secretary rejects sociologist’s alternatives to Kalpasar

In a  sharp rejoinder over the proposed Kalpasar reservoir project in the Gulf of Khambhat, with former Government of India Secretary Babubhai Navalawala has dismissed the alternatives floated by veteran sociologist Prof. Vidyut Joshi as mere “supplements” rather than substitutes for the mega project. In the rejoinder to Prof. Joshi’s recent column Samudra Manthan  in Gujarati daily  Sandesh  (see news item here ), Navalawala has argued that the scientific options suggested by the sociologist cannot replace Kalpasar. 

Rethink Kalpasar, end 'civil engineering mindset' in Gujarat's water strategy

Prof. Vidyut Joshi, a prominent sociologist and one of the leading protagonists of the mega Narmada dam project, has raised critical questions regarding the viability of Gujarat’s ambitious Kalpasar project. Writing in the Gujarati daily Sandesh under the headline "Let us consider alternatives scientifically for the Kalpasar project," Joshi argues that rather than remaining trapped in a "civil engineering mindset" focused solely on constructing massive dams, the state must pivot to modern, sustainable, and technologically viable alternatives to quench the thirst of the arid Saurashtra region.