Skip to main content

National PUCL objects to Gujarat branch support to Congress candidate against Modi

The People's Union for Civil Rights (PUCL) has taken strong exception to some of Gujarat office bearers' participation in a forum formed to support Congress candidate Madhusudan Mistry, fighting against the BJP's prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi from the Vadodara parliamentary constituency. A statement issued by V Suresh, PUCL general secretary, and distributed by well-known Vadodara-based environmentalist Rohit Prajapati, who is also a Gujarat PUCL office bearer, has said, "It is the stated policy of PUCL (both national and state units) not to align itself or support in any manner whatsoever any political party."
The statement, also signed by Prof Prabhakar Sinha, president, national PUCL, declared, "The organisation shall not and does not endorse, support or oppose any candidate, in any elections -- whether it is parliamentary, state or local body elections." The statement comes in the wake of  reports that PUCL is part of the newly-formed People's Forum for Madhusudan Mistry, meant to support the Congress candidate in Vadodara constituency in the ensuing Lok Sabha polls. Prajapati, it is learnt, especially strongly opposed participation of a section of the PUCL office bearers to the Congress candidate.
Sources said, three of PUCL's office bearers, including Gautam Thaker, who is general secretary, PUCL, Gujarat, and two others, Dhiru Mistry and Chinu Shrivastav, were present on the rostrum, created for NGO "support" for the Congress candidate. This irked the national PUCL, which said, "We would like to place on record that PUCL does not support and is not supporting any specific candidate in Vadodara constituency. Office bearers of PUCL, both national and state units, are not authorised to announce, commit or pledge PUCL to be part of any formation such as the forum launched in support of Madhusudan Mistry".
"Even if any individual member has indeed participated in the formation of such a forum in their personal capacity, we would like to make it explicitly clear that this does not have the approval or support of the PUCL", the PUCL declared, adding, "We would also like to place on record that all office bearers of our units have been asked not to participate in any forum to support/oppose specific candidates even in their personal capacities."
The statement follows a forum of 30 non-government organizations (NGOs), which included a section of the Gujarat PUCL office bearers, declared their support for Mistry. "Some of its members had earlier said they would support any political party during the Lok Sabha polls", sources said, adding, "The NGOs claimed that they had come together to demolish the myth about Gujarat's development." They released a book 'Sachhai Gujarat Ki' that talked about Gujarat's low rank in social and development parameters, written by Hemant Shah.
Shah, who authored the book, said, "We are not supporting any political party. Our support is for Mistry as he is very hardworking and honest man. He is a good candidate and has fought a lot for the rights of downtrodden and needy people. That doesn't mean we are supporting Congress." Mistry himself has long been running an NGO called Disha for the last several decades among tribals of Sabarkantha district of Gujarat. Shah and several others who participated in the programme do not belong to the PUCL.
"Gujarat is lagging in many areas and the state is not number one in any segment, including investments. We have come together to demolish the myth of development and Gujarat model. We will organize many programmes in the coming days and urge people to vote for Mistry," Shah, who is known for his insights into economic affairs and teaches economics in a prestigious  college in Ahmedabad, said.

Comments

TRENDING

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual.  I don't know who owns this site, for there is nothing on it in the About Us link. It merely says, the Nashik Corporation  site   "is an educational and news website of the municipal corporation. Today, education and payment of tax are completely online." It goes on to add, "So we provide some of the latest information about Property Tax, Water Tax, Marriage Certificate, Caste Certificate, etc. So all taxpayer can get all information of their municipal in a single place.some facts about legal and financial issues that different city corporations face, but I was least interested in them."  Surely, this didn't interest...

Beyond the 'plum' posting: Why the caste lens still defines bureaucratic success

Following my recent blog on former IAS bureaucrat Atanu Chakraborty’s sudden exit as non-executive chairman of HDFC Bank, a few colleagues from the Gujarat cadre — mostly those I interacted with during my Gandhinagar stint (1997–2012) as the Times of India representative — reacted rather sharply. Most of them sent their responses directly on WhatsApp, touching upon on the merits and demerits of Chakraborty’s controversial move. One former IAS officer, a Dalit, however, went further, raising a broader question: why do some officials like Chakraborty secure plum post-retirement assignments, while others are overlooked?

Blaming RTE, not underfunding: Education groups hit back at NITI Aayog working paper

A preliminary working paper by Arvind Virmani, economist and member of the Government of India think tank NITI Aayog, has concluded that the Right to Education (RTE) Act — enacted to guarantee free and compulsory schooling for children between six and fourteen — has actually worsened learning outcomes rather than improved them. The paper, published in March 2026 and reported by The Print on 16 April, has drawn sharp pushback from education rights advocates, who argue it builds a politically motivated narrative against constitutionally guaranteed entitlements.