Skip to main content

US fact-tank "finds" two-thirds support BJP, yet 65% satisfied with living conditions

 Is Narendra Modi-led BJP heading for a two-thirds majority in the forthcoming Lok Sabha polls? It would seem so, if a recent survey carried out by a US-based “nonpartisan fact tank” in Washington, DC, Pew Research Center, is to be believed. Beating all opinion polls, which give BJP around 200 seats – a little over one-third of the Lok Sabha strength – Pew claims BJP has the support of 60 per cent of urban and 64 per cent of rural India, saying, “New poll finds Indians are disgruntled about the state of their nation, deeply worried about a range of problems facing their society and supportive of new leadership in New Delhi.”
Ironically, if Pew “non-partisan fact tank” is to be believed, the very same percentage of people “remain fairly upbeat" abut their personal economic situation today and the economic prospects for both India and the next generation. The survey results were released less than a week before the Lok Sabha polling process is to begin, amid wide-scale allegations of manipulation of opinion polls with the help of money power.
Pew says, it carried out the survey under the guidance of Princeton Survey Research Associates International making 2,464 face-to-face interviews between December 7, 2013, and January 12, 2014 “in Hindi, Tamil, Bengali, Telugu, Odia, Marathi, Kannada and Gujarati” in 15 of the 17 most populous states, which together are home to about 91% of the adult Indian population.”
Claiming its poll fairly accurate, it says, “The margin of sampling error is ±3.8 percentage points. For the results based on the full sample, one can say with 95 per cent confidence that the error attributable to sampling and other random effects is plus or minus the margin of error."
Pew researcher Bruce Stokes comments, “Rural Indians prefer the BJP, despite Congress’ long ties to the rural poor. The Congress party has long drawn much of its support from rural Indians and has pursued policies to solidify that backing, such as the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act and the National Food Security programme, both of which Indians overwhelmingly favour."
He adds, "Nevertheless, rural Indians favour the BJP, not Congress, to lead the next government by more than three-to-one (64 per cent to 18 per cent), roughly the same proportion as favor the BJP in urban areas.”
The researcher says, “Young Indians think the BJP is best suited to deal with India’s problems. By roughly three-to-one Indians ages 18 to 29 say the BJP will do a better job combating corruption, creating jobs, curbing inflation, reducing terrorism, helping the poor and ending political gridlock. Indians despair about their nation’s direction but they still have hope for the economy. By more than two-to-one Indians think India is headed in the wrong direction.”
At the same time, the Pew researcher believes, “But a majority (57 per cent) says the economy is good, despite slow growth. Six-in-ten (62 per cent) expect the economy to improve in the next 12 months. And 64 per cent think today’s children will be better off as adults than the current generation.” Pew adds, “just 10 per cent say it is very good and 47 per cent see it as good. Women (61 per cent) are somewhat more satisfied than men (53 per cent).”
It adds, “This positive assessment comes despite a recent government estimate that economic growth in the fiscal year ending in March 2014 would be just 4.9 per cent, up only slightly from expansion of just 4.5 per cent in the previous year. Indians in the southern states of Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka are the most dissatisfied with current economic conditions: 60 per cent of them say the national economic situation is bad.” Pew doesn’t explain this contradiction.
Despite such a good outlook, Pew “finds” seven-in-ten Indians are “dissatisfied with the way things are going in their country; only three-in-ten (29 per cent) are satisfied. This discontent is shared by young and old, rich and poor, urban and rural Indians in almost equal measure: men (72 per cent) and women (67 per cent); Indians ages 18 to 29 (72 per cent) and those 50 years of age and older (69 per cent); those with a primary school education or less (67 per cent) and Indians with at least some college education (75 per cent); and people living in urban areas (72 per cent) as well as Indians in rural areas (68 per cent).”

Comments

TRENDING

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual.  I don't know who owns this site, for there is nothing on it in the About Us link. It merely says, the Nashik Corporation  site   "is an educational and news website of the municipal corporation. Today, education and payment of tax are completely online." It goes on to add, "So we provide some of the latest information about Property Tax, Water Tax, Marriage Certificate, Caste Certificate, etc. So all taxpayer can get all information of their municipal in a single place.some facts about legal and financial issues that different city corporations face, but I was least interested in them."  Surely, this didn't interest...

Beyond the 'plum' posting: Why the caste lens still defines bureaucratic success

Following my recent blog on former IAS bureaucrat Atanu Chakraborty’s sudden exit as non-executive chairman of HDFC Bank, a few colleagues from the Gujarat cadre — mostly those I interacted with during my Gandhinagar stint (1997–2012) as the Times of India representative — reacted rather sharply. Most of them sent their responses directly on WhatsApp, touching upon on the merits and demerits of Chakraborty’s controversial move. One former IAS officer, a Dalit, however, went further, raising a broader question: why do some officials like Chakraborty secure plum post-retirement assignments, while others are overlooked?

Blaming RTE, not underfunding: Education groups hit back at NITI Aayog working paper

A preliminary working paper by Arvind Virmani, economist and member of the Government of India think tank NITI Aayog, has concluded that the Right to Education (RTE) Act — enacted to guarantee free and compulsory schooling for children between six and fourteen — has actually worsened learning outcomes rather than improved them. The paper, published in March 2026 and reported by The Print on 16 April, has drawn sharp pushback from education rights advocates, who argue it builds a politically motivated narrative against constitutionally guaranteed entitlements.