Skip to main content

India's global gender ranking one of the worst in health, survival, economic participation

 In a major setback at a time when Prime Minister Narendra Modi is seeking to make a big political capital out of the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business report showing India "jump" its global ranking by 30 points, a new report by the high-profile World Economic Forum (WEF) has said that there there is little improvement in India's Global Gender Index ranking, especially in fields of economic participation and health.
India not just ranks worse among the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) countries, with whom it claims to stand in competition in different global sectors, but also two of its neighbours – Bangladesh and Myanmar.
Among BRICS nations, while India ranks 108th, Brazil ranks 90th, Russia 71st, China 100th, and South Africa 19th. On the other hand, among neighbours, Bangladesh ranks 47th, Myanmar 83rd, Sri Lanka 109th, Nepal 111th, and Pakistan the worst – 143rd among 144 countries assessed across the world.
Sector-wise, India ranks 139th in economic participation, 112th in educational attainment, 141st in health and survival – one of the worst in the world – and 19th in political participation.
India's global ranking in different
sub-sectors
Prepared by the world’s most powerful Geneva-based elite group, WEF, which seeks to engage top world leaders – businesspersons, politicians and academicians – to “shape global, regional, and industry agendas”, the report says, India’s decline in its overall Global Gender Gap Index ranking is “largely attributable" to a widening of its gender gaps in overall empowerment and in healthy life expectancy and basic literacy.”
It adds, “In addition, newly available data reveals the scale of India’s gender gap in women’s share among legislators, senior officials and managers, as well as professional and technical workers for the first time in recent years, highlighting that continued efforts will be needed to achieve parity in economic opportunity and participation.”
No doubt, the report states, India succeeded “in fully closing its primary and secondary education enrolment gender gaps for the second year running, and, for the first time has nearly closed its tertiary education gender gap”, but regrets, “It continues to rank fourth-lowest in the world on health and survival, remaining the world’s least-improved country on this subindex over the past decade.”
Even as giving credit to Indira Gandhi for pushing the country towards political empowerment, the report notes, “With more than 50 years having passed since the inauguration of the nation’s first female prime minister in 1966, maintaining its global top 20 ranking on the Political Empowerment subindex will require India to make progress on this dimension with a new generation of female political leadership.”

Praising Bangladesh for doing phenomenally, the report says, the country’s 47th ranking is a further consolidation of “its position as the region’s top performer and climbs several spots this year, recording progress across all dimensions of the economic opportunity and participation subindex”.
It adds, “Specifically, the country has improved gender parity for legislator, senior official and manager as well as professional and technical roles, in addition to estimated earned income and wage equality for similar work—despite a slight widening of its healthy life expectancy gender gap.”
On Pakistan, the report comments, the country “remains the region’s lowest-ranked country and second-to-last ranked overall. It records some progress on closing the basic literacy gender gap, and on women’s labour force participation, but this is largely outweighed by reversals on estimated earned income and a significant re-opening of the country’s enrolment in tertiary education gender gap according to the latest data.”

Comments

TRENDING

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual.  I don't know who owns this site, for there is nothing on it in the About Us link. It merely says, the Nashik Corporation  site   "is an educational and news website of the municipal corporation. Today, education and payment of tax are completely online." It goes on to add, "So we provide some of the latest information about Property Tax, Water Tax, Marriage Certificate, Caste Certificate, etc. So all taxpayer can get all information of their municipal in a single place.some facts about legal and financial issues that different city corporations face, but I was least interested in them."  Surely, this didn't interest...

Beyond the 'plum' posting: Why the caste lens still defines bureaucratic success

Following my recent blog on former IAS bureaucrat Atanu Chakraborty’s sudden exit as non-executive chairman of HDFC Bank, a few colleagues from the Gujarat cadre — mostly those I interacted with during my Gandhinagar stint (1997–2012) as the Times of India representative — reacted rather sharply. Most of them sent their responses directly on WhatsApp, touching upon on the merits and demerits of Chakraborty’s controversial move. One former IAS officer, a Dalit, however, went further, raising a broader question: why do some officials like Chakraborty secure plum post-retirement assignments, while others are overlooked?

Blaming RTE, not underfunding: Education groups hit back at NITI Aayog working paper

A preliminary working paper by Arvind Virmani, economist and member of the Government of India think tank NITI Aayog, has concluded that the Right to Education (RTE) Act — enacted to guarantee free and compulsory schooling for children between six and fourteen — has actually worsened learning outcomes rather than improved them. The paper, published in March 2026 and reported by The Print on 16 April, has drawn sharp pushback from education rights advocates, who argue it builds a politically motivated narrative against constitutionally guaranteed entitlements.