Skip to main content

Three Indian revolutionaries who became victims of Stalin's 'oppressive' regime

In an important revelation, a Facebook post has revealed how, when Stalin continues to be "still worshipped by most of the Indian Communist parties", three Indian Communists became victims of  the Soviet dictator's oppressive regime. 
No doubt, the social media post states, "The first version of the Communist Party of India was founded on 17 October 1920 in Tashkent by a group of emigre Indian revolutionaries." Howevver, there were some, "among those early Indian Communists, who got caught on the wrong side of inner-party quarrels in the Soviet Union, and paid with their lives." 
Naming the Communists, it says, "Three Bengali Communists -- Abani Mukherjee, Virendranath Chattopadhyaya and Ghulam Ambia Khan Lohani -- perished in Stalin's purges. For obvious reasons, they do not figure much in the official pantheon or historiography of the Communist parties in India."
The posts, by Indraneel Dasgupta, who is Professor of Economics at the Indian Statistical Institute, says, "But, as the passage of time brings perspective and makes ancient divisions irrelevant, perhaps it's time to make sure that these men are not totally forgotten. They deserve their own place in history."
According to Dasgupta, "These men were all fascinating intellectuals -- brilliant, cosmopolitan, multilingual, faithful, dedicated, obsessive compulsive, egomaniacal, quarrelsome, flawed as only humans can be." 
He adds, "They were the kind of professional revolutionaries who went, as Brecht put it,
'Changing countries faster than our shoes
Though the wars of the classes
Despairing, when we saw only injustice
And no rebellion.'
"
Insisting that Indian Communist parties continue with their "pathetic inability to come to terms with history", the post, which has been reproduced by Bhaskar Sur, says, "Now we know how Stalinist extremism also stymied the growth of the Workers and Peasants Party just when it had begun to grow in strength." 
Sur adds, "With the expulsion of MN Roy from Comintern, as S Dutta Gupta has rightly observed, 'the independent growth of Indian Commission was stalled for ever'. Not many are aware that at least three Indian revolutionaries living in self exile in the Soviet Union became victims of the Great Terror." 

Comments

TRENDING

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual.  I don't know who owns this site, for there is nothing on it in the About Us link. It merely says, the Nashik Corporation  site   "is an educational and news website of the municipal corporation. Today, education and payment of tax are completely online." It goes on to add, "So we provide some of the latest information about Property Tax, Water Tax, Marriage Certificate, Caste Certificate, etc. So all taxpayer can get all information of their municipal in a single place.some facts about legal and financial issues that different city corporations face, but I was least interested in them."  Surely, this didn't interest...

Beyond the 'plum' posting: Why the caste lens still defines bureaucratic success

Following my recent blog on former IAS bureaucrat Atanu Chakraborty’s sudden exit as non-executive chairman of HDFC Bank, a few colleagues from the Gujarat cadre — mostly those I interacted with during my Gandhinagar stint (1997–2012) as the Times of India representative — reacted rather sharply. Most of them sent their responses directly on WhatsApp, touching upon on the merits and demerits of Chakraborty’s controversial move. One former IAS officer, a Dalit, however, went further, raising a broader question: why do some officials like Chakraborty secure plum post-retirement assignments, while others are overlooked?

Blaming RTE, not underfunding: Education groups hit back at NITI Aayog working paper

A preliminary working paper by Arvind Virmani, economist and member of the Government of India think tank NITI Aayog, has concluded that the Right to Education (RTE) Act — enacted to guarantee free and compulsory schooling for children between six and fourteen — has actually worsened learning outcomes rather than improved them. The paper, published in March 2026 and reported by The Print on 16 April, has drawn sharp pushback from education rights advocates, who argue it builds a politically motivated narrative against constitutionally guaranteed entitlements.