USCIRF recommends sanctions on India’s RAW, review of arms sales over religious freedom concerns

The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) has called for a review of U.S. arms sales to India, sanctions on India’s intelligence agency, the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), and legislation to counter transnational repression by governments like India against individuals in the United States.

These recommendations accompany USCIRF’s decision to designate India as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC) for the sixth consecutive year, citing severe violations of religious freedom and human rights. The CPC label is reserved for the world’s worst offenders in restricting religious liberties.

In its 2025 Annual Report, USCIRF noted a continued deterioration of religious freedoms in India, pointing to anti-minority hate speech by ruling party leaders during the 2024 elections, discriminatory laws, punitive demolitions of mosques and churches, and violent attacks by Hindu nationalist groups against Muslims, Christians, and other minorities.

The report stated, “Throughout its 10 years in power, [the Indian government] has increasingly enforced sectarian policies seeking to establish India as an overtly Hindu state, in contrast with the secular principles of the constitution… The Indian government also continued to expand its repressive tactics to target religious minorities abroad, specifically members of the Sikh community and their advocates.”

USCIRF highlighted that misinformation and hate speech by officials fueled attacks on minorities, while violent incidents—including cow vigilante assaults and mob lynchings—persisted with impunity.

To address these concerns, USCIRF recommended:

- Designating India as a CPC

- Sanctioning Indian officials and entities, including RAW

- Reviewing U.S. arms sales to India in light of anti-minority violence

- Passing the Transnational Repression Reporting Act of 2024 to monitor foreign government crackdowns on U.S.-based individuals

The report urges the U.S. State Department to act on these recommendations and hold the Indian government accountable for alleged repression, both domestically and abroad.

Comments

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. I don't know who owns this site, for there is nothing on it in the About Us link. It merely says, the Nashik Corporation site "is an educational and news website of the municipal corporation. Today, education and payment of tax are completely online." It goes on to add, "So we provide some of the latest information about Property Tax, Water Tax, Marriage Certificate, Caste Certificate, etc. So all taxpayer can get all information of their municipal in a single place.some facts about legal and financial issues that different city corporations face, but I was least interested in them." Surely, this didn't interest...

Beyond the 'plum' posting: Why the caste lens still defines bureaucratic success

Following my recent blog on former IAS bureaucrat Atanu Chakraborty’s sudden exit as non-executive chairman of HDFC Bank, a few colleagues from the Gujarat cadre — mostly those I interacted with during my Gandhinagar stint (1997–2012) as the Times of India representative — reacted rather sharply. Most of them sent their responses directly on WhatsApp, touching upon on the merits and demerits of Chakraborty’s controversial move. One former IAS officer, a Dalit, however, went further, raising a broader question: why do some officials like Chakraborty secure plum post-retirement assignments, while others are overlooked?

Blaming RTE, not underfunding: Education groups hit back at NITI Aayog working paper

A preliminary working paper by Arvind Virmani, economist and member of the Government of India think tank NITI Aayog, has concluded that the Right to Education (RTE) Act — enacted to guarantee free and compulsory schooling for children between six and fourteen — has actually worsened learning outcomes rather than improved them. The paper, published in March 2026 and reported by The Print on 16 April, has drawn sharp pushback from education rights advocates, who argue it builds a politically motivated narrative against constitutionally guaranteed entitlements.

Search This Blog