Skip to main content

An assault on reason: Recalling 1998 saffron brigade attack on anti-witch-hunt campaign

I was recently forwarded a memorandum submitted to the Governor of Gujarat, dated November 8, 1998. It instantly transported me back to a time when I was settling into Gandhinagar as the Times of India correspondent. The document was sent to me by Lankesh Chakravarti, a well-known Gujarat-based activist who has long led campaigns against superstition across the state, staging demonstrations and skits to raise awareness among ordinary people.
The memorandum documents what it calls an "attack by an armed Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) mob on NGOs and social organisations campaigning against atrocities on Adivasi women (dakan or witch-hunting) at Shamlaji (District Sabarkantha, Gujarat) on 3rd and 4th November 1998."
Shamlaji, home to a 500-year-old temple dedicated to Lord Vishnu, is a place I’ve visited often — not so much for prayer, but to admire its stunning architecture. Adivasi communities inhabit the surrounding areas. According to the memorandum, a coalition of human rights organisations was subjected to a violent attack by an armed mob allegedly affiliated with the VHP during a peaceful awareness campaign against witch-hunting practices in the region.
The campaign, which was widely covered by the local media at the time, was led by several Gujarat-based NGOs including the Veham Andhshraddha Virodhi Manch, Vikas Adhyayan Kendra, and Adivasi Ekta Vikas Mandal. Their goal was to raise awareness about the abuse of Adivasi women, who were being subjected to brutal practices disguised as exorcism rituals at the Nagdhara Kund (pond) near the Shamlaji temple.
The activists had documented testimonies of women being stripped, beaten, and tortured under the pretext of "driving out evil spirits" — a practice that had been condemned by both local Panchayats and rights groups. “People were fully aware of these despicable acts. So-called educated people would even gather to 'enjoy' the spectacle of women being stripped," Lankesh told me.
Ironically, the saffron-clad defenders of Hindu culture targeted these NGOs instead of supporting the campaign against witchcraft. On the afternoon of November 3, 1998, a group claiming VHP affiliation arrived at the exhibition site and began abusing the organisers. They accused the activists — particularly the women — of being foreign agents and Christian missionaries, using derogatory and sexist language. Despite the presence of police, the mob continued issuing threats and demanded that the organisers vacate the area, boasting of their influence over local authorities.
The situation deteriorated further that night. Around 50 armed men carrying hockey sticks, swords, and daggers stormed the venue in full view of the police. According to the memorandum, the mob threatened to burn down the exhibition and warned of further violence if the campaign was not halted. Some of the abuse was recorded on video by the organisers.
Police and local officials allegedly failed to intervene. In fact, some officers were reportedly seen chatting amicably with the attackers. Even as the threat escalated, the response remained sluggish. Fearing for their safety, the activists dismantled the exhibition on November 4. They also reported witnessing fresh violence at the Kund, where Adivasi women had again been stripped and assaulted.
Their attempt to leave was blocked early that morning when the mob once again encircled them at around 6 a.m., demanding the surrender of the video evidence. Shockingly, the police appeared to side with the mob and advised the activists to hand over the cassette to avoid "trouble." Eventually, three activists were taken to the police station along with the tape, which was then seized. Its authenticity was questioned.
The memorandum submitted on November 8 demanded the return of the video evidence, an independent judicial inquiry, and swift action against those responsible — including police officers who allegedly colluded with the attackers. The NGOs also called for the prosecution of VHP members for their "filthy sexist behaviour," for encouraging superstitious violence against women, and for obstructing constitutionally protected human rights work.
Recalling the episode, Lankesh told me, "We had been fighting against this superstition since 1988. Some of us even approached the Supreme Court to stop the practice of witchcraft. We got the judgment in 1998. Following the Shamlaji incident, the administration took action to halt the practice. Ever since, the entire Nagdhara Kund is cordoned off, and outsiders are barred from accessing the site. You can’t stop women from taking what they believe is a holy dip in the pond, but ever since, there are separate bathing areas for men and women."

Comments

  1. Dear Rajiv,
    Your story on superstition has reminded me of our efforts to stop Narayan Bali and Kaal Serp Vidhi at Chandod. Vigyan Jatha Chaiman Jayant Pandya and seven people came to Vadodara from Rajkot. I had warned Pandya that we may have to face trouble as Sandesh published a note from Jatha and Brahmin Guru Chandrashekhar Pandit had already warned Jayant Pandya. We had arranged a press conference. I also had sought police protection but prior to our going to Chandod fifty to sixty people burge into our meeting. They ransacked Pandya's car and all of us were thrashed..In local TV channel they said," If they enter Chandod , we shall cut them into pieces and give the mutton to fish. The Commissioner did not allow us to go to Chandod. It's very difficult to break people's so-called 'Shraddha". You know five Rationalists have been killed and so far none of the killers are apprehended. Let's hope the BJP Government is gone.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

NOTE: While there is no bar on viewpoint, comments containing hateful or abusive language will not be published and will be marked spam

TRENDING

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual.  I don't know who owns this site, for there is nothing on it in the About Us link. It merely says, the Nashik Corporation  site   "is an educational and news website of the municipal corporation. Today, education and payment of tax are completely online." It goes on to add, "So we provide some of the latest information about Property Tax, Water Tax, Marriage Certificate, Caste Certificate, etc. So all taxpayer can get all information of their municipal in a single place.some facts about legal and financial issues that different city corporations face, but I was least interested in them."  Surely, this didn't interest...

Beyond the 'plum' posting: Why the caste lens still defines bureaucratic success

Following my recent blog on former IAS bureaucrat Atanu Chakraborty’s sudden exit as non-executive chairman of HDFC Bank, a few colleagues from the Gujarat cadre — mostly those I interacted with during my Gandhinagar stint (1997–2012) as the Times of India representative — reacted rather sharply. Most of them sent their responses directly on WhatsApp, touching upon on the merits and demerits of Chakraborty’s controversial move. One former IAS officer, a Dalit, however, went further, raising a broader question: why do some officials like Chakraborty secure plum post-retirement assignments, while others are overlooked?

Blaming RTE, not underfunding: Education groups hit back at NITI Aayog working paper

A preliminary working paper by Arvind Virmani, economist and member of the Government of India think tank NITI Aayog, has concluded that the Right to Education (RTE) Act — enacted to guarantee free and compulsory schooling for children between six and fourteen — has actually worsened learning outcomes rather than improved them. The paper, published in March 2026 and reported by The Print on 16 April, has drawn sharp pushback from education rights advocates, who argue it builds a politically motivated narrative against constitutionally guaranteed entitlements.