Skip to main content

India faces 'double burden' of low incomes, extreme inequality, finds top global study

The 2026 World Inequality Report reveals stark and persistent inequalities across income, wealth, gender, and global financial systems, with India positioned at the centre of several critical trends. The report, drawing on the work of over 200 researchers coordinated by the World Inequality Lab, provides a comprehensive assessment of global disparities up to 2025.
India exemplifies the global "double burden" of low average incomes coupled with extreme internal inequality. The report finds that "average incomes in North America & Oceania and Europe are several times higher than the global mean, while those in Sub-Saharan Africa and South & Southeast Asia remain far below average." India's position within South & Southeast Asia places it in one of the world's most populous yet lower-income regions. 
The data shows a significant shift in India's global standing over recent decades; while "much of its population has moved into the middle 40%" of the global income distribution, indicating the rise of a new middle class, inequality persists intensely within the country.
Wealth concentration in India is severe and exceeds income inequality. The report states that "the top 1% alone controls 37% of global wealth," a pattern mirrored in India where domestic wealth is highly concentrated. Specifically, "in India, the top 1% own about 40.1% of total personal wealth." This extreme concentration means that "the top decile commands the majority in all regions," a reality reflected in India's high wealth gap ratios.
Inequality outlook – India
The report also documents how India, alongside other BRICS nations, faces a structural disadvantage within the global financial architecture. It notes that "BRICS countries face a consistent burden of around 2.1%," highlighting their role as "net providers of capital to wealthier economies." This "exorbitant privilege," once associated solely with the United States, has evolved into a broader advantage for rich nations, creating a system where "poorer nations transfer more than one percent of world GDP to richer ones through debt service, profit repatriation, and financial flows—this is approximately three times more than development aid flowing in the opposite direction."
On gender inequality, the report finds that "women capture just over a quarter of total labour income, a share that has barely shifted since 1990." In South & Southeast Asia, women’s share is only 20%. The gap widens dramatically when unpaid work is accounted for: "when unpaid domestic and care labor is included, the gap widens sharply. On average, women earn only 32% of what men earn per working hour."
This undervaluation of women's labour represents not only a fairness issue but also, as the report argues, "a structural inefficiency: economies that undervalue half of their population’s labour undermine their own capacity for growth and resilience."
Income shares in India, 1900-2024
The report concludes that rising inequality is a political choice, noting that "the tools exist. The challenge is political will." It points to policy instruments like progressive taxation and global financial reform, suggesting that "even modest rates of a global minimum tax on billionaires and centi-millionaires could raise between 0.45% and 1.11% of global GDP" to fund essential investments.
For India, a country navigating rapid growth amid profound disparities, the report's findings underscore the urgent need for policies that address extreme concentration at the top while investing in human capital and equitable participation in the global economy.

Comments

TRENDING

Ram, Bam and Bengal: Memories of a Left turn towards the Right

The BJP’s massive electoral win in West Bengal is being interpreted across political persuasions — except, of course, by the BJP itself — as the result of the alleged deletion of around 90 lakh voters from the electoral rolls during the controversial intensive revision process. This may well be true, given my own experience in Gujarat regarding the shoddy manner in which electoral revisions have often been conducted. In West Bengal, there also appeared to be a political angle to the exercise. But I am not interested in discussing that here, as enough has already appeared in the media on the subject.

Pseudoscience? A Chandigarh man's brain-hacking claim nobody knows how to handle!

I receive a lot of unsolicited material in my line of work — op-eds, press releases, open letters, manifestos. But the document that landed in my inbox recently gave me pause in a way that most don't. It came formatted as a formal submission, signed by a Chandigarh resident called Sumeet, addressed to me in my capacity as someone who works with editorial and public interest content. The subject line read: Submission as Cyber and Human Rights Volunteer – Cyber Ethics and Human Rights Concerns.

China's hukou and India's caste: A comparison that ignores the Jianmin

The other day, I saw an interesting article, "Does China have a caste system or is it a figment of imagination of Indians?" It wonders whether "China, the world's manufacturing powerhouse and a socialist state governed by a Communist party", has a birth-based caste system that shapes access to education, healthcare, and opportunity.