Skip to main content

NYT: RSS 'infiltrates' institutions, 'drives' religious divide under Modi's leadership

A comprehensive New York Times investigation published on December 26, 2025, chronicles the rise of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) — characterized as a far-right Hindu nationalist organization — from a shadowy group founded in 1925 to the world's largest right-wing force, marking its centenary in 2025 with unprecedented influence and mainstream acceptance.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who joined the RSS as a young boy and later became a full-time campaigner before being deputized to its political wing in the 1980s, delivered his strongest public tribute to the group in his August 2025 Independence Day address. Speaking from the Red Fort, he called the RSS a "giant river" with dozens of streams touching every aspect of Indian life, praising its "service, dedication, organization, and unmatched discipline."
The report describes how the RSS has deeply infiltrated India's institutions — government, courts, police, media, and academia — through a vast network of affiliates, including student wings, trade unions, farmers' unions, professional networks, religious outfits, and charities. Researchers at Sciences Po in Paris identified 2,500 organizations with traceable ties to the RSS, forming a tightly networked entity. This structure allows the group to shape political careers, place loyalists in key positions, and exert influence with little transparency or accountability, as it maintains no detailed records and spreads assets across small trusts.
Founded by Dr. Keshav Baliram Hedgewar amid fears of declining Hindu pride following historical Muslim invasions and British colonial rule, the RSS's early leaders, including second chief M.S. Golwalkar, openly drew inspiration from 1930s-1940s European fascist parties. In his 1939 book, Golwalkar cited Hitler's treatment of Jews to argue that non-Hindus in India should wholly subordinate to the "Hindu Nation," deserving no privileges or citizen rights.
The organization faced multiple bans, notably after a former member assassinated Mahatma Gandhi in 1948, leading to decades as a pariah. It gained momentum through events like the 1975 Emergency under Indira Gandhi, when mass arrests of RSS leaders generated sympathy, and the 1992 Babri Masjid demolition in Ayodhya by mobs including RSS affiliates, which galvanized Hindu unity but triggered nationwide riots.
Under Modi's leadership since 2014, the RSS agenda advanced significantly: the Supreme Court cleared the way for a grand Ram Temple in Ayodhya (inaugurated in 2024 on the mosque demolition site), and Jammu & Kashmir's semi-autonomous status was revoked in 2019. The number of daily RSS gatherings (shakhas) — featuring physical drills, devotional songs, ideological discussions, and a salute to the saffron flag — has doubled over the past decade, now totaling 83,000 across India.
The article highlights growing religious divisions, linking RSS affiliates to vigilante violence: parading through Muslim neighborhoods, ransacking churches, enforcing boycotts of Muslim businesses, lynching over beef allegations, and attacking interfaith couples. In Uttar Pradesh under Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath — often seen as a potential Modi successor — authorities used bulldozers to demolish homes of Muslim protest leaders while allowing Hindu counter-demonstrations.
Current RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat has adopted more nuanced public rhetoric, criticizing vigilante excesses, advocating reduced caste rigidity, and claiming "Hindu rashtra" means cultural consolidation where all Indians are inherently Hindu. However, he has urged higher Hindu birth rates compared to "other communities," discouraged "hooliganism" while calling for societal "vigilance" and intervention when necessary — language the report describes as doublespeak that leaves room for extremist actions.
The NYT concludes that the RSS's entrenched roots ensure enduring power beyond Modi, having remade India into a more polarized society where its vision of Hindu supremacy increasingly dominates public life.
---

Comments

TRENDING

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual.  I don't know who owns this site, for there is nothing on it in the About Us link. It merely says, the Nashik Corporation  site   "is an educational and news website of the municipal corporation. Today, education and payment of tax are completely online." It goes on to add, "So we provide some of the latest information about Property Tax, Water Tax, Marriage Certificate, Caste Certificate, etc. So all taxpayer can get all information of their municipal in a single place.some facts about legal and financial issues that different city corporations face, but I was least interested in them."  Surely, this didn't interest...

Caste, class, and Patidar agitation: Veteran academic 'unearths' Gujarat’s social history

Recently, I was talking with a veteran Gujarat-based academic who is the author of several books, including "Social Movements in India: A Review of Literature", "Untouchability in Rural India", "Public Health and Urban Development: The Study of Surat Plague", and "Dalit Identity and Politics", apart from many erudite articles and papers in research and popular journals.

Beyond the 'plum' posting: Why the caste lens still defines bureaucratic success

Following my recent blog on former IAS bureaucrat Atanu Chakraborty’s sudden exit as non-executive chairman of HDFC Bank, a few colleagues from the Gujarat cadre — mostly those I interacted with during my Gandhinagar stint (1997–2012) as the Times of India representative — reacted rather sharply. Most of them sent their responses directly on WhatsApp, touching upon on the merits and demerits of Chakraborty’s controversial move. One former IAS officer, a Dalit, however, went further, raising a broader question: why do some officials like Chakraborty secure plum post-retirement assignments, while others are overlooked?