Skip to main content

Bairstow dismissal: English have tough time accepting they are not lords any more

By Rohith Chivukula* 

One of the greatest rivalries in cricket history, the Ashes have always been an incendiary affair between the Australians and the English. This year's edition of the men's Ashes series has not disappointed either, with no love lost between either side. However, it was one particular incident during the second test of the series, held at Lord's, that made the headlines. On the fifth day, Jonny Bairstow ducked a Cameron Green bouncer, which was the last ball of the over, and moved on from the moment to have a chat with his skipper Ben Stokes. Unfortunately for him, the ball had not been declared dead yet. Rather it was his innings that came to an end, as wicketkeeper Alex Carey immediately took advantage of the situation to hit the stumps and catch Bairstow walking.
Admittedly, this was not a method of dismissal that one would see very often. The English team took offence to this, citing unwritten rules 'in the spirit of the game' that the Australians failed to follow to maintain the prestige of the game. After the game, Ben Stokes came out saying he would've withdrawn the appeal for the wicket if it were his side that had done it, to which the Australian captain Pat Cummins thought it would suffice to reply with an "Ok." Stuart Broad also spoke out, saying, " What amazed me and what I could not believe was that not one senior player among Australia questioned what they had done."
In September of 2014, the County Cricket Championship Division One game between Nottinghamshire and Yorkshire would have been just another county test match, if not for the peculiar nature of the dismissal of one of the Nottinghamshire batsmen. Samit Patel, who was on strike, decided to leave the ball that he faced and relax. Just as he raised his right foot, which until then bound him to the crease, the Yorkshire wicketkeeper, who was waiting for an error in judgement from the batsman, quickly whipped the bails off to dismiss him. The commentators were quick to label Patel "slack," and praised the keeper's "brilliant work", saying it was "very, very smart of him" to "get a wicket out of nothing."
In the post-match interview, Jonny Bairstow, the Yorkshire wicketkeeper, was asked what his thoughts on his actions were. "It's within the rules of the game," he replied. Nine years later, in the first test of the 2023 Ashes series, the English wicketkeeper tried to get Australian batsman Travis Head out in a manner similar to the much-discussed Bairstow dismissal. When confronted about it and asked if he would repeat the action, Bairstow, who was, of course, the custodian for the English wicket, told Head, "Bloody oath, I would". Jonny Bairstow is a twelve-year veteran of the game. Why he would act surprised and betrayed when he was dismissed is well beyond me. His teammates Stokes and Broad, who have publicly come out with statements condemning the dismissal, are infamous for their share of 'dirty deeds' in the gentleman's game too.
It is important to note that the incidents and 'dirty deeds' mentioned have not violated any rules, and are completely legal. The problem, however, lies in the fact that the spirit of the game seems to possess the English every time an unorthodox dismissal happens against them, but never when they benefit from it. Calling the Bairstow dismissal controversial is meaningless, especially if it is within the laws that govern the sport. On the off-chance that some of the members of the England cricket team are unsure about the rules and would like to double-check them, what better a place to do so than the very ground they were playing on! The Marleybone Cricket Club, based at Lord's, is home to the official Laws of Cricket, a comprehensive code of all guidelines relating to the sport of cricket.
Like all other sports, cricket too is heavily influenced by narratives. The Australians are sticking by their decision, and rightly so. After all, they did nothing wrong. In 2020, members of the Australian cricket team were asked if they felt 'Mankading' was okay. The majority, including Alex Carey, said they felt it was unethical and that they wouldn't do it. In 2019, an article was published explaining that the Mankad 'doesn't sit right with the Aussies.' Now, how different that form of dismissal is from the Bairstow incident I really can't tell, but I am sure they would be playing different tunes if they were on the receiving side of the dismissal. That goes to say, nothing comes close to the tantrums of the English, who seem to want to control the narratives of who the good and the bad guys are. English players and press, in particular, Piers Morgan, who is giving his incessant anti-immigrant and right-wing sermons a reprieve, are constantly whining about the ethics of the game, and how the Australians are guilty of poor conduct, implying that the English maintained themselves well.
Shortly after the test, the Marleybone Cricket Club put out a statement apologising to the Australian players for the poor conduct of its members and announced the suspension of three of them, allegedly for hurling abuse at Usman Khawaja in the aftermath of the Bairstow dismissal as he was passing through the long room after lunch. Khawaja, who played no part in the stumping, was reportedly singled out for the abuse. None of this seems to concern the British press.
Cricket was a colonial gift to the territories of the British Empire. That might explain the air of entitlement that the English have whenever something goes against them, and the narratives that they are successfully able to generate favouring themselves. Take, for instance, the very naming of the 'Mankad.' The first recorded instance of such a runout was by an English bowler, playing for Sheffield cricket club, named Thomas Barker, who repeated the trick four more times. Will the mode of dismissal similar to the Bairstow stumping be named a 'Carey' now? In the case of the dismissal of Samit Patel, had the roles been reversed, would the narratives stay the same? I think not. Ravichandran Ashwin and Deepti Sharma always seem to be catching strays from the English press whenever something occurs in a different part of the world, but never Stuart Broad or Ben Stokes.
Unwritten rules of the game should remain a figment of one's imagination. The test at Lord's seems to have brought out the bitter hypocrisy in the English cricket team that has exorcised the real spirit of the game. For a country that only recently held an ostentatious coronation ceremony for their new king, the English seem to have a tough time accepting that they are not, in fact, lords over the game, nor have they ever been.
---
*BTech student

Comments

TRENDING

King Corona and his descendents: How long will the Dynasty last?

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD*  “Corona ” is in the media once again, precipitating a dĆ©jĆ -vu feeling and some amount of panic among the people. Among viruses and microorganisms King Corona and its descendents enjoy Royalty Status. "What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet." This classic quote from Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet is well known. But does it hold well in current times? The events during the past five years challenge the Bard's view.

India’s 2021 excess deaths: was it the virus — or the containment frenzy?

By Bhaskaran Raman* Tyagu (name changed), a vegetable vendor recalls of his brother’s death in 2021. The victim had a normal fever, but was forcibly taken away to the hospital saying that it was Covid. He had been coerced into taking the Covid-19 “vaccines” by that time. After 10 days in hospital, he died. There was no proper information during his hospital stay, and no one was allowed to visit, saying that visitors could also get Covid.

Old bias, new excuses: How western media misrepresents India’s anti-terror strikes

By Gajanan Khergamker  The recent Indian military strikes on Pakistan, dubbed Operation Sindoor, have sparked a storm of international media coverage. Several prominent outlets have portrayed India as the aggressor in the escalating conflict, raising concerns over biased reporting. This commentary critiques coverage by foreign media outlets such as The New York Times , Reuters, BBC, and CNN, which have often been accused of framing India’s actions as escalatory while downplaying or omitting critical context regarding Pakistan’s role in fostering terrorism. By examining historical patterns and current geopolitical dynamics, this analysis highlights the recurring selective framing, omission of evidence, and a tendency to favor narratives aligned with Western geopolitical interests over factual nuance.

जैविक जीवित संसाधनों व प्रकृति पर निर्भर मजदूरों की व्यापक आर्ऄिक सुरक्षा कैसे हो?

- राज कुमार सिन्हा*  भारत में  60 करोą„œ से अधिक लोग भूमि, जल, जंगल और समुद्र जैसे प्राकृतिक स्रोतों पर निर्भर हैं । देश में 14.6 करोą„œ छोटे और सीमांत किसान, 14.4 करोą„œ खेतिहर मजदूर ( ą¤¬ą„œी संख्या में दलित हैं), 27.5 करोą„œ वन निवासी, 2.8 करोą„œ मछुआरे, 1.3 करोą„œ पशुपालक और 1.7 करोऔ़ कारीगर हैं जो सीधे तौर पर  प्रकृति के साऄ और प्रकृति के भरोसे काम कर रहे हैं । लगभग 6 करोą„œ मौसमी मजदूर हैं जो काम के सिलसिले में लगातार अपने गांव से बाहर जाते हैं और लौटते हैं। प्रकृति निर्भर समुदायों की आर्ऄिक गतिविधियां जो ą¤¬ą„œे पैमाने पर जीवन निर्वाह और छोटी आय के लिą¤ है। वर्तमान आर्ऄिक नीतियों के कारण, जो कॉर्पोरेट्स और ą¤¬ą„œे व्यवसायों का समर्ऄन करती है, प्रकृति निर्भर समुदाय के लिą¤ अव्यवहारिक होती जा रही है। 

राजस्ऄान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, ą¤ारखंऔ और केरल फिसऔ्औी: जल जीवन मिशन के लक्ष्य को पाने समन्वित प्रयास जरूरी

- राज कुमार सिन्हा*  जल संसाधन से जुऔ़ी स्ऄायी समिति ने वर्तमान लोकसभा सत्र में पेश रिपोर्ट में बताया है कि "नल से जल" मिशन में राजस्ऄान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, ą¤ारखंऔ और केरल फिसऔ्औी साबित हुą¤ हैं। ą¤œą¤¬ą¤•ि देश के 11 राज्यों में शत-प्रतिशत ग्रामीणों को नल से जल आपूर्ति शुरू कर दी ą¤—ą¤ˆ है। रिपोर्ट में समिति ने केंद्र सरकार को सिफारिश की है कि मिशन पुरा करने में राज्य सरकारों की समस्याओं पर गौर किया जाą¤। 

Crying air, water, and earth: A call to conserve our dying natural resources

By Dr. Gurinder Kaur*  Air, water, and earth—these natural resources are essential for the survival of all living beings, including humans, animals, and plants. Life in any form is impossible without them. These are precious gifts of nature to humankind. However, in the pursuit of economic growth, modern humans have severely polluted these valuable resources in an attempt to satisfy their greed.

The WHO Pandemic Agreement: Why India should reconsider its stance

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD*  For more than the past three years, the WHO has been trying its best to push the Pandemic Treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations in unholy haste, instead of conducting a proper appraisal of the impact of the measures taken during the Covid-19 pandemic—a routine exercise after any pandemic to guide future strategies.  This raises questions about whether the WHO, under China’s influence, is trying to conceal its acts of omission and commission during the pandemic, including obstructing investigations into the origins of SARS-CoV-2. The WHO recently faced a setback when the USA decided to cut all ties with the organization. 

Environmental report raises alarm: Sabarmati one of four rivers with nonylphenol contamination

By Rajiv Shah  A new report by  Toxics Link , an Indian environmental research and advocacy organisation based in New Delhi, in collaboration with the  Environmental Defense Fund , a global non-profit headquartered in New York, has raised the alarm that Sabarmati is one of five rivers across India found to contain unacceptable levels of nonylphenol (NP), a chemical linked to "exposure to carcinogenic outcomes, including prostate cancer in men and breast cancer in women."

21-day security operation targets Maoist presence, prompts questions on civil impact

By Harsh Thakor*  Union Home Minister Amit Shah has described a recent counter-insurgency operation along the Chhattisgarh-Telangana border as a significant achievement for Indian security forces in their efforts against Maoist groups. The three-week-long operation in the Karreguttalu Hills reportedly resulted in the deaths of 31 individuals identified as members of Maoist formations.