Skip to main content

Failing to get people's support, Wagner group or Prigozhin pose no direct threat to Putin

By Harsh Thakor 

In recent weeks, a coup d’état in Russia staged by Yevgeny Prigozhin caused tremors all over the world. There appears nothing left of either the western aspirations of an ‘End of Putin’, nor the advances of some of the Russian authorities. The event was no real coup and it was never designed as such. What happened was a manifestation of a necessary struggle for Russian imperialism on the question of who leads the armed forces of Russia and of the establishment of a sole high command.
Prigozhin deployed every ounce of his energy against key figures of the High Command of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation: General Valery Vasilyevich Gerasimov, Chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces and First Deputy Minister of Defense and – primarily – General Sergei Kuzhugetovich Shoigu, the Minister of Defense. It is those two who represent the Armed Forces and it is they who compulsively need to posess control over everything, to apply a strict centralisation of all resources of the state under one leadership, due to the war. Through the advent of the grave crisis of the ongoing war, the situation of the rule of the siloviki called inner circle, sharing joint power between several state entities like the armed forces and the secret services, has turned its benefits into disadvantages. It does not fit to this war and does not serve victory.
It danced to the tune for Russian imperialism that the Wagner mercenaries could act independently, when the need was a balance of power for this group around Putin. All political power springs out of the barrel of a gun with the army being the pivot of the state, not the secret service. That is the essence of the so-called rivalry between the contending forces.. Thus Prigozhin even after Putin labelled him a traitor and declared his liquidation, did not open his mouth against his old friend.
The whole ploy was a manifestation of Russian imperialism. Therefore Shoigu, in early June, made a move to bring all the mercenaries under the umbrella of the Ministry of Defense. Prigozhin stated, “Wagner will not sign any contracts with Shoigu”; “When we started participating in this war, no one said that we would be obliged to conclude agreements with the Ministry of Defence”; “None of the Wagner fighters is ready to go down the path of shame again. And so no one will sign contracts”.
Then Putin came to the fore taking side with Shoigu and the ministry: “This has to be done and it has to be done as quickly as possible,” Putin said “in line with common sense, with established practice and the law”.


One should not negate the consequences that the incidents could invite, as well as the fatal general crisis Russian imperialism is submerging or the fact that they will definitely not be able to achieve a complete victory by conquering or demilitarizing Ukraine, as their stated goal. The outcome will be most probably, a frozen war, with some large Ukrainian territory in the south and east occupied by Russia. For now Putin, Shoigu and Gerasimov have compromised a military conflict with an outstanding trained and well equipped mercenary troop at least in the size of a division on their home territory within only one day and without any mayor casualties on both sides. This cannot be analysed as a manifestation of weakness, but it has parallels to the development of the German Reich during the First World War: The Kaiser was on path of retreat while the OHL (Oberste Heeresleitung -High Command of the German Armed Forces), Hindenburg and Ludendorff, were gaining, because the war plundered too many resources for two heads. If Putin, Prigozhin Gerasimov and Shoigu are ousted, is out of question.
The failed general political line that could not suppress the people to stand up against their interests to advance losing the war – has crystallised the current situation. On the other hand, it is illustrated that it was Prigozhin’s desperate position and his bureaucratic ambitions under pressure from the Defense Ministry that motivated this mutiny.
Constructing a private army of such size as the “Wagner” PMC would have been impossible otherwise; Prigozhin, though he is a millionaire (if not a billionaire), definitely did not possess the resources to maintain all combat units on his own, the resources for which were granted to him directly by the monopolists. It was with the help of “Wagner” that Russian imperialists could fight for the capture of oil and gold mining sites without tarnishing the face of the Russian army and, therefore, operating much more flexibly. Military formation of the “Wagner” PMC demonstrates the fascist method of organizing The very existence of a private military army is completely prohibited in the constitution of the country. Thus, the Wagner is the modern equivalent of the fascist Freikorps formed in the Weimar Republic, but with the distinction t from the beginning “Wagner” is deployed as a weapon against Third World nations and not against communists.
The struggle between the two sides has features of absolute and primary nature, while the collusion is temporary and secondary. Both sides have adopted political positions that would pave way to make super-fast decisions and divert path depending on the specific impact of the situation. Putin, speaking about the mutiny, never mentioned Prigozhin by name, but simply threatened to punish “those” people who are responsible for organizing the mutiny. The same tactics were used by Prigozhin with regard to Putin. This alone manifested a possible resolution of the struggle through collusion. Nevertheless, the military actions of Prigozhin and the Ministry of Defence confirmed their determination to use violence. Never before has a government army air strike been launched within the borders of the country against a moving army column of a hostile faction in the middle of the day when there were civilian cars on the highway.
The lack of volunteers and the gigantic organizational problems that emerged even before the first failed offensive of forced mobilization in September meant it was imperative to recruit more people than were available. In order to accumulate the numbers of recruits they turned to prisons. The army of the Russian Federation could not afford to tarnish its “denazifying” and “orthodox” image with higher criminals as mercenaries, so was forced to adopt another organizational form. Still such an organization to undertake the most daunting military work was already there – the PMC “Wagner”. This structure already had trusted people and planted it’s work. All that was left to do was to reinstate their troops. Nevertheless, even after all this, the problem was still not completely solved, and more people were needed. In order to attract even more criminals, “Wagner” was provided another fascist benefit: at the end of the contract with the “Wagner”, the criminals, without trial, being released without completing the remainder of their prison terms.
Thus, the role and tasks of the “Wagner” PMC since the start of the war with Ukraine have expanded and now conduct not only dirty military operations in Africa and the Middle East, but also the recruitment of criminals for the needs of the front.
However, Prigozhin’s mysterious moves are not affecting the Russian movement, or the Russian masses. The Russian government will lie in the most derogatory ways that in fact everything was under control, that the dismantling of their power posed no peril to the lives of citizens and soldiers, that from the beginning the peaceful outcome was an inevitability. An objective analysis of the events of June 23rd and 24th shows that everything that could destabilised has gone out of control. All the leading fascists, their trusted bureaucrats and ideologues were shaken to the floor. They are making hasty and unprincipled change of positions, to cover up their mistakes. But the Russian imperialists will never be able to retract Putin’s words that a real mutiny is taking shape in the country which poses a mortal threat to the Russian nation and statehood.
No section of the army officer caste expressed support over Prigozhin and he did not receive any support from the population. The only real concrete result is that the Wagner group, and Prigozhin in particular, no more pose as a direct threat to Putin, which is what Putin’s objective. The Prigozhin adventure reveals is that there are deep cracks in the armour of the regime.


Both Prigozhin and the Ministry of Defense endorse – the rotten old autocratic and monopolistic order, in which the people have no right to protest, let alone to strike. Prigozhin only pays lip service to “oligarchy” and says that he is working on behalf of the welfare of the people.
Neither of the two sides wants to end the war with Ukraine. Both sides of this conflict champion the prospects of Russia’s monopolistic capitalists, primarily oil and gas capitalists. Prigozhin, while condemning in form about the leadership, is in essence not being critical about the aggressive nature of this war, but only about the conditions that were placed before him as part of it. Both sides are waging a war of aggression to loot the Ukrainian national economy for the benefit of the Russian oligarchy – the Russian imperialists, which would pave way to enhance their strategic economic and military position in the fight against American imperialists for hegemony in the third world, particularly in Ukraine. Both are simply two sides of the fascist coin.
Thus, this situation is a personification of the incredibly sharp internal contradictions of the rotten Russian society, which is in a never ending crisis. On the economic level it is an incredible waste of resources for the Russian imperialists, which otherwise could have been used on the front lines. On the political level, it is a launching pad in the embryonic stage for the escalating struggle within the ranks of the imperialists themselves, which will lead to self –destruction on their own state with each passing day. On the ideological plan, it portrays of absence of principles, opportunism and disrespect for the people.
Contradictions have unfolded to the fore. Still democratic forces should combat such a scenario for Western imperialist countries to exploit and promote their expansionist interests or hegemony. Indirectly it has acted as a prop for Western Imperialism.
Harsh Thakor is a freelance journalist who studies world affairs .Thanks information from Russian Maoists and Red Herald



Still not dead and buried: A rural Punjab move to keep alive the spirit of Naxalbari

By Harsh Thakor  There was a well attended and most lively meeting in memory of Thana Singh of around 2000 persons in Thana Singh’s village of Bhallai Ana in community hall in Muktsar on September 17th, with most encouraging participation of youth. It was a testimony that the spirit of Naxalbari is still not dead and buried with the audience literally reverberating the message of Naxalbari. In spite of every effort of the state to crush the naxalbari movement, it is not dead and buried, as we witnessed here. I was privileged to participate in the event.

Dev Anand ably acted as westernised, urban educated, modern hero, as also anti-hero

By Harsh Thakor  On September 26th we celebrated the birth centenary of legendary actor Dev Anand. Dev Saab carved out a new epoch or made a path breaking contribution in portraying romanticism and action in Bollywood cinema, giving his style or mannerisms a new colour. Arguably no Bollywood star manifested glamour in such a dignified or serene manner or struck the core of an audience’s soul in romantic melodies. Possibly we missed this evergreen star being cast in a Hollywood film. Dev Anand is like an inextinguishable soul of Bollywood. Although not as artistic or intense as Dilip Kumar, Raj Kapoor or Ashok Kumar ,Dev Anand surpassed them all for liveliness or flamboyance, with his performances radiating g energy on the screen, in realms rarely transcended. In his own right, Dev Saab, was a craftsman, like his classical contemporaries, with a characteristic composure. Perhaps never was a Bollywood star so suave, bubbling or charming as Dev Anand, who often looked like an Indian versi

Ludicrous how Gandhi is ritually remembered by our leaders with broom in their hands

By Firoz Bakht Ahmed  On every Gandhi Jayanti day, ludicrous scenes of multi-hued political parties’ leaders with brooms in their hands are seen doing rounds on television commemorating Mahatma Gandhi regarding “swachhta” (cleanliness). This won’t do unless there’s cleansing of heart followed by the cleanliness of the poor voters’ stinking areas. Tragedy with Mahatma Gandhi is that he is just ritually remembered by us on the occasion of his anniversaries but he is worth remembering each day owing to his sagacious words that contain wisdom for all ages and in all times.

Abrogation of Art 370: Increasing alienation, relentless repression, simmering conflict

One year after the abrogation by the Central Government of Art. 370 in Kashmir, what is the situation in the Valley. Have the promises of peace, normalcy and development been realised? What is the current status in the Valley? Here is a detailed note by the People’s Union for Civil Liberties , “Jammu & Kashmir: One Year after Abrogation of Art. 370: Increasing Alienation, Relentless Repression, Simmering Conflict”:

Why Govt of India, Sangh Parivar want to stop the use of ‘India’? What's in a name?

By Ram Puniyani  Coincidentally after the opposition parties came together to form INDIA (Indian National Democratic Inclusive Alliance), the ruling BJP is desisting from the use of word India in official communiqués and its parent organizations RSS has issued a fatwa that only word Bharat should be used for our country. While inviting the representative’s participants of G 20, the President issued the invitation in the name of ‘Rashtrapati of Bharat’. Since then BJP is on the track of avoiding the use of the word India in all its pronouncements, saying this word smacks of colonial legacy since this word was given to the country by British colonial rulers. Mr. Hemant Biswa Sarma of BJP said that word India is part of the colonial legacy and should be removed. RSS chief and other functionaries have intensified this message. Speaking at a function at Guwahati Mr. Bhagwat, stated “We must stop using the word India and start using Bharat. At times we use India to make those who speak Eng

Why originality of Gandhi's thoughts, example of his life still inspire people world over

By Moin Qazi*  Mahatma Gandhi's birth anniversary reopens a familiar debate around his legacy every year. How could a frail man use his moral strength to galvanize 400 million Indians in their struggle for independence from the mighty British Empire? How did Gandhi inspire ordinary people to turn fear into fearlessness and anger into love? What were his tools for fighting colonialism? How could he inspire the world to embrace his philosophy of nonviolence? What can we learn from him today? And is he still relevant?

Pot calling the kettle black: EAM Jaishankar accusing Global North of double standards

By Chandra Vikash*  While addressing a Ministerial Session on Saturday 23 September 2023 in New York on the sidelines of the ongoing UN General Assembly session titled ‘South Rising: Partnerships, Institutions and Ideas’, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said that economically dominant countries are leveraging production capabilities and those who have institutional influence have weaponized these capabilities. He also cited an example of Covid-19 and stressed that it is still a world of double standards."

In today’s India aggressive violence has become weapon of choice for buying peace

By Harasankar Adhikari  Mahatma (the great soul) Gandhi's vision stands for "ahimsa" (non-violence) and ‘Satyagraha’ (holding of the truth). It is absolutely the beacon of his spirituality. His searches for peace and bliss are within the realm of ahimsa and satyagraha. Although his works are confined to the political movement for India's freedom as the political leader, his lifelong practise is enshrined as the political saint of India( according to Swami Yogananda Paramhans). His devotion and self-sacrifice for the universe are the revelation of his sainthood. 

How the slogan Jai Bhim gained momentum as movement of popularity and revolution

By Dr Kapilendra Das*  India is an incomprehensible plural country loaded with diversities of religions, castes, cultures, languages, dialects, tribes, societies, costumes, etc. The Indians have good manners/etiquette (decent social conduct, gesture, courtesy, politeness) that build healthy relationships and take them ahead to life. In many parts of India, in many situations, and on formal occasions, it is common for people of India to express and exchange respect, greetings, and salutation for which we people usually use words and phrases like- Namaskar, Namaste, Pranam, Ram Ram, Jai Ram ji, Jai Sriram, Good morning, shubha sakal, Radhe Radhe, Jai Bajarangabali, Jai Gopal, Jai Jai, Supravat, Good night, Shuvaratri, Jai Bhole, Salaam walekam, Walekam salaam, Radhaswami, Namo Buddhaya, Jai Bhim, Hello, and so on.

Regretful: Kapil Dev retired not leaving Indian cricket with integrity he upheld

By Harsh Thakor  Kapil Dev scaled heights as an entertainer and a player upholding the spirit of the game almost unparalleled in his era. In his time he was cricket’s ultimate mascot of sportsmanship On his day Kapil could dazzle in all departments to turn the tempo of game in the manner of a Tsunami breaking in. He radiated r energy, at a level rarely scaled in his era on a cricket field. Few ever blended aggression with artistry so comprehenisively. Although fast medium, he could be as daunting with the ball as the very best, with his crafty outswinger, offcutter, slower ball and ball that kicked from a good length. Inspite of bowling on docile tracks on the subcontinent, Kapil had 434 scalps, with virtually no assistance. I can never forget how he obtained pace and movement on flat pancakes, trapping the great Vivian Richards in Front or getting Geoff Boycott or Zaheer Abbas caught behind. No paceman carried the workload of his team’s bowling attack on his shoulders in his eras muc