Skip to main content

Gujarat's water anarchy? 16.7% of Narmada water going to industry, 33% of targeted area irrigated

The Narmada project is something that has always excited me, including how much water will be distributed and to which sector. A few days ago, when I was talking to a top Gujarat government insider, I was a little surprised when I was told that it is up to the “respective states to decide how much Narmada water they would distribute among various sectors” out of the total quota allocated to the four states—Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Maharashtra, and Rajasthan—as per the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal award of 1979.
The “award” specified the quantum of utilizable water “at 75% dependability” to be shared as follows: Of the total water availability of 28 million acre-feet (MAF) from the Narmada River, Madhya Pradesh is supposed to get 18.25 MAF, followed by Gujarat with 9.00 MAF (mostly from the dam), Rajasthan with 0.50 MAF, and Maharashtra with 0.25 MAF.
Meant primarily as an irrigation project, this insider, who refused to be named, told me that it is up to Gujarat to decide how much of its 9 MAF quota of Narmada water it might want to allocate to the industry. “Can it be 70%?” I specifically asked. He replied that it is up to the state to decide; “the tribunal is silent on this.” The Narmada Control Authority (NCA), the inter-state body that monitors the flow of Narmada water, too, “has no say in this.”
When he regretted that, for the last two decades, the Gujarat government has not been publishing figures on how much water is going to which sector of the state, nor is there any authentic data on the area being irrigated with Narmada waters, I queried him: How much of Narmada water does he estimate is going to industry right now?
“It is very difficult to say because of a lack of data, but according to the figures floating around in the corridors of power, 1.5 MAF of water out of 9 MAF is currently going to the state’s industry,” this insider told me. This means that, already, a whopping 16.7% of the water is going to industry! And with Gujarat emerging as India's “primary semiconductor center,” a water intensive sector, with major investments being attracted by policy support, this percentage is likely to increase.
And why is the industry getting so much water? I asked this insider. “This is primarily because the pressure from agriculture for Narmada water has not increased, as out of about 18 lakh hectares (ha) that were supposed to be irrigated, only about one-third of the area is actually being irrigated via Narmada canal waters.”
The insider asserted, “If you ask the officials overseeing the Narmada project, they would say that 12 lakh ha have come under irrigation. However, this figure is based on satellite imagery, which does not distinguish between different sources of water. The blue spots do not necessarily indicate Narmada-based water. My information suggests that the actual irrigated area is just about 6 lakh ha.”
Calling this a result of “water anarchy” in water management, he noted that the Gujarat government’s decision to lay down pipelines to ensure that farms receive Narmada water in lieu of minor and sub-minor canals has “failed” despite huge expenditures towards this end.
“Most of the pipelines face multiple problems. They are blocked by silt in many places, and nobody is there to clean them. In other places, they have not been laid down properly, so water does not flow naturally through them. There are also spots where power is required to lift the water, and this too is not working,” the insider said, adding, “As a result, in various places, farmers simply lift water from the Narmada canal by sinking tubewell pumps.”

Comments

  1. If you add the allocation for Urban water supply, particularly south of Sabarmati, which was supposed to be ZERO, the allocation diverted from irrigation would be even bigger.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

NOTE: While there is no bar on viewpoint, comments containing hateful or abusive language will not be published and will be marked spam

TRENDING

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual.  I don't know who owns this site, for there is nothing on it in the About Us link. It merely says, the Nashik Corporation  site   "is an educational and news website of the municipal corporation. Today, education and payment of tax are completely online." It goes on to add, "So we provide some of the latest information about Property Tax, Water Tax, Marriage Certificate, Caste Certificate, etc. So all taxpayer can get all information of their municipal in a single place.some facts about legal and financial issues that different city corporations face, but I was least interested in them."  Surely, this didn't interest...

Beyond the 'plum' posting: Why the caste lens still defines bureaucratic success

Following my recent blog on former IAS bureaucrat Atanu Chakraborty’s sudden exit as non-executive chairman of HDFC Bank, a few colleagues from the Gujarat cadre — mostly those I interacted with during my Gandhinagar stint (1997–2012) as the Times of India representative — reacted rather sharply. Most of them sent their responses directly on WhatsApp, touching upon on the merits and demerits of Chakraborty’s controversial move. One former IAS officer, a Dalit, however, went further, raising a broader question: why do some officials like Chakraborty secure plum post-retirement assignments, while others are overlooked?

Blaming RTE, not underfunding: Education groups hit back at NITI Aayog working paper

A preliminary working paper by Arvind Virmani, economist and member of the Government of India think tank NITI Aayog, has concluded that the Right to Education (RTE) Act — enacted to guarantee free and compulsory schooling for children between six and fourteen — has actually worsened learning outcomes rather than improved them. The paper, published in March 2026 and reported by The Print on 16 April, has drawn sharp pushback from education rights advocates, who argue it builds a politically motivated narrative against constitutionally guaranteed entitlements.