Skip to main content

Top Hindu builder ties up with Muslim investor for a huge minority housing society in Ahmedabad

There is a flutter in Ahmedabad's Vejalpur area, derogatorily referred to as the "border" because, on its eastern side, there is a sprawling minority area called Juhapura, where around five lakh Muslims live. The segregation is so stark that virtually no Muslim lives in Vejalpur, populated by around four lakh Hindus, and no Hindu lives in Juhapura.
In fact, declared a "disturbed area" under a Gujarat law, no Muslim can buy property in Vejalpur, and no Hindu can buy property in Juhapura. Ironically, even when a Hindu wants to buy property in Vejalpur, he or she must obtain administrative approval, which often takes three to four months—possibly to "ascertain" that the buyer is not masquerading as a Muslim.
Now, coming to the flutter I referred to at the beginning of this blog: Considered one of the most prestigious and reputable builder groups, the Bakeris—who have developed around a dozen societies in Vejalpur, housing around 15,000 people—have surprised Vejalpur residents by deciding to build a huge housing society in the vacant area beyond Vejalpur, tying up with a prominent Muslim builder.
A huge billboard has been displayed on the main road leading to the Juhapura-Sarkhej area, and its image is widely shared on social media. A social worker in Juhapura told me the reason why the Bakeris entered into a partnership with a Muslim builder: there is a huge demand for "decent" flats among Muslims, many of whom are willing to shell out Rs 1.25 crore to Rs 1.60 crore for three- or four-bedroom flats.
"A recently built three-bedroom apartment in the area was sold out in no time, each for Rs 1.25 crore. The Bakeris' plan appears to be to build 500 houses for Muslims," he said, adding, "This is perhaps the first time a top builder has decided to build a housing society specifically for Muslims. And, to be 'safe,' they have entered into a partnership with a Muslim builder."
Meanwhile, social media users are buzzing with words and phrases like "shocking," "problematic," "not good for the valuation of our flats," "another community next door—that's not good for us," "for the Bakeris, it might be business, but it's surprising that the local government and public allowed it," and "all society members should unite, talk, and oppose this."
Indeed, it is common for many Hindus to avoid buying flats in the Vejalpur area close to the so-called border, as they, for some reason, carry a sense of insecurity. Yet, since flats nearer to the "border" are relatively cheaper than in other parts of Ahmedabad, people often choose this area to live in.
I will end my blog with what happened more than two decades ago. A college friend had come from Delhi, and belonging to a well-to-do Muslim family, he asked me if he could invest money in a plot of land. Then working with the Times of India, I sought the help of a Bakeri Group PRO and introduced my friend to a senior executive, hoping he could invest.
We had a cosy discussion for about half an hour, and he selected a plot in a farmhouse project the Bakeris had developed as a weekend home. Even as we parted ways, I noticed the senior executive getting a little nervous. The next day, I received a phone call from him. He told me, "Kindly, politely tell your friend we can't sell the plot to him. We don't sell to Muslims."
Decades later, have the Bakeris experienced a change of heart? They have decided to build a full-scale housing society for Muslims. I joked with a friend: "What is this project about? Hindu-Muslim ekta (unity) complex?" He laughed, "That's would be a good poster, worth pasting it outside the proposed site... My dear, it's pure business—nothing else for the Bakeris."

Comments

  1. The act by the state government is an insult to human values. Apart from that it is discriminatory based on faith.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I bet - if such multi - community that includes muslims is made, there will be harassment done by them on the basis of their religion..ji had...halala.. non veg..ka fir... no hindu festivals would be allowed... I think Bakeri himself will not enter the society to celebrate the festivals... There is a reason why Kerala churches have announced for Hindu neighbours , instead of muslims _ as they have a tendency to encroach, disregard other faiths, and most importantly they cannot and won't speak against hard liners from their community who will try to manipulate liberals and sane ones on the basis of religion. Terrible step by Bakeri ..but it is truly just business... hence Hindus should avoid purchases with Bakeri it seems.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

NOTE: While there is no bar on viewpoint, comments containing hateful or abusive language will not be published and will be marked spam

TRENDING

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual.  I don't know who owns this site, for there is nothing on it in the About Us link. It merely says, the Nashik Corporation  site   "is an educational and news website of the municipal corporation. Today, education and payment of tax are completely online." It goes on to add, "So we provide some of the latest information about Property Tax, Water Tax, Marriage Certificate, Caste Certificate, etc. So all taxpayer can get all information of their municipal in a single place.some facts about legal and financial issues that different city corporations face, but I was least interested in them."  Surely, this didn't interest...

Beyond the 'plum' posting: Why the caste lens still defines bureaucratic success

Following my recent blog on former IAS bureaucrat Atanu Chakraborty’s sudden exit as non-executive chairman of HDFC Bank, a few colleagues from the Gujarat cadre — mostly those I interacted with during my Gandhinagar stint (1997–2012) as the Times of India representative — reacted rather sharply. Most of them sent their responses directly on WhatsApp, touching upon on the merits and demerits of Chakraborty’s controversial move. One former IAS officer, a Dalit, however, went further, raising a broader question: why do some officials like Chakraborty secure plum post-retirement assignments, while others are overlooked?

Blaming RTE, not underfunding: Education groups hit back at NITI Aayog working paper

A preliminary working paper by Arvind Virmani, economist and member of the Government of India think tank NITI Aayog, has concluded that the Right to Education (RTE) Act — enacted to guarantee free and compulsory schooling for children between six and fourteen — has actually worsened learning outcomes rather than improved them. The paper, published in March 2026 and reported by The Print on 16 April, has drawn sharp pushback from education rights advocates, who argue it builds a politically motivated narrative against constitutionally guaranteed entitlements.