Skip to main content

Gujarat govt can't hope to collect more than 10% of the iron needed for Sardar Statue

 
Even as Gujarat’s powerful babudom is gearing up for the high-profile stone laying ceremony on October 31, birth anniversary of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, for the so-called Statue of Unity, proposed as the tallest statue of the world, insiders close to chief minister Narendra Modi doubted if his idea of getting iron from farmers from all over the country in order to build its structure would ever succeed. A senior official, refusing to be named, suggested, even Modi believes that even the most ideal scenario it would not be possible to collect more than 700 tonnes of iron.
“This became clear in an internal meeting. We concluded that even if 200 to 250 tonnes of iron is collected, that would be enough”, the official said, adding, “This is at best ten per cent of the iron actually needed to build the statue – an estimate of 2,500 tonnes of iron.” Saying that iron collection, to be undertaken after Modi’s October 31 rally at Kevadia Colony, off Narmada Dam, would be “largely a symbolic and a political gesture”, the official said, rest of the iron would have to be bought from the open market. Babus have been asked to fan out to different states to organize iron collection, starting in November.
The estimated cost of the Statue of Unity – which Gujarat-based activists have wittingly described as “Statue of Disunity” because it would involve a tourism project by acquiring tribals’ farm land of 70-odd villages – worked out about two years ago is Rs 2,500 crore. Officials say, while the corporates have been asked to contribute, “it is doubtful they will be able to give much. Hence, we would have to budget the whole project. Even if we provide Rs 500 crore per year, which is not much, the project would be completed in the next four-and-a-half years. Tenders have been floated, and the developer will be selected soon.”
Notably, Gujarat government sources say, the earlier apprehension that the iron collected from the farmers would “not be used in the statue, but in the railings and other small beautification projects to be taken up around the Statue of Unity, has been put at rest.” They added, “We have taken technical opinion in the matter. The iron so collected from the farmers can be used in the statue itself. Of course, it will have to be properly processed and melted before it is being used.”
Apprehensions on quality of iron were expressed by a top Modi aide, who told www.counterview.net June this year (click HERE to see) that the “iron collected from the farmers will obviously be of different types and suspected quality. Some of it may be simply scrap or junk. Obviously, it cannot be used for constructing a quality Sardar statue.” The aide had added, “Quality metal, instead, would be needed for constructing the 182 metre high statue in order to ensure that it lasts for generations to come. Things will become clear once technical consultation of the project is over.”
Meanwhile, a view is emerging among top state bureaucrats that the diversion of the entire babudom into the collection of iron and building the statue – a political requirement of Modi ahead of the 2014 polls – is leading to failure of the state’s Narmada and water resources officials to give enough time to the Narmada project, especially the network of canals, which till date remain largely incomplete. Out of early 18 lakh hectares of land targeted to be cultivated with Narmada waters in Gujarat, a potential for 5.59 hectares (ha) has been created, but the actual irrigation has not been more than 2 lakh hectares.
The view is also emerging that priorities of the Gujarat government have begun to change from agriculture to urban and industrial development. “Already, nearly one million acre feet (MAF) of water out of a total of nearly nine MAF which could be made available from the Narmada dam’s reservoirs is being diverted to industry. About two years ago, the Comptroller and Auditor General of India had already sharply criticized the Gujarat government for using more waters than allocated to industry and urban areas by the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal", an official said.

Comments

TRENDING

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual.  I don't know who owns this site, for there is nothing on it in the About Us link. It merely says, the Nashik Corporation  site   "is an educational and news website of the municipal corporation. Today, education and payment of tax are completely online." It goes on to add, "So we provide some of the latest information about Property Tax, Water Tax, Marriage Certificate, Caste Certificate, etc. So all taxpayer can get all information of their municipal in a single place.some facts about legal and financial issues that different city corporations face, but I was least interested in them."  Surely, this didn't interest...

Beyond the 'plum' posting: Why the caste lens still defines bureaucratic success

Following my recent blog on former IAS bureaucrat Atanu Chakraborty’s sudden exit as non-executive chairman of HDFC Bank, a few colleagues from the Gujarat cadre — mostly those I interacted with during my Gandhinagar stint (1997–2012) as the Times of India representative — reacted rather sharply. Most of them sent their responses directly on WhatsApp, touching upon on the merits and demerits of Chakraborty’s controversial move. One former IAS officer, a Dalit, however, went further, raising a broader question: why do some officials like Chakraborty secure plum post-retirement assignments, while others are overlooked?

When the hospital closes, the heart stops: What's behind India's 'excess' COVID deaths?

A landmark study , “The mortality burden from COVID in low-income settings: evidence from verbal autopsies in India”, using verbal autopsies of 20,000 deaths reveals that only one-third of India’s pandemic excess mortality was directly caused by SARS-CoV-2. The rest — a hidden toll running into millions — was the collateral damage of a healthcare system brought to its knees.