Skip to main content

Critical factors that determine, contribute to the success and effectiveness of NGOs

By Rohit Rakshit 

Over the last few years, I have been fortunate to work with numerous non-governmental organizations (NGOs) across various states in the country. This experience has allowed me to gain insights into their diverse areas of work while also enabling me to analyze the key attributes that contribute to the success of a good NGO. According to my observations, the following are the critical factors that determine the effectiveness of an NGO.
1. Visionary Leadership & Governance – This is a very important point to the list. Leaders are the ones who can make or break an organization. An organization's success hinges on the leadership and managerial skills of its leaders. Over the last few years of my career, I have been able to engage with leaders of non-profit organisations, including founders and have analyzed how their qualities correlate with the organisation. Several aspects define leadership in non-profits, including the following-
A. Leaders Vs Bosses – There is a huge difference between leaders and bosses, which might have been described in detail in other articles. Picture a dance floor where the leader orchestrates a symphony of collaboration, while the boss commands a solo act. Nevertheless, leaders view their employees as co-facilitator and travelers in the whole journey while bosses are very dominating, hardly participates in the process and are always in the look out to exploit their employees without contributing hardly anything to the process. This is a huge contributing factor to the culture and environment in the organization and the work which they do. If employees are provided with a good working environment with a decent pay and opportunities, employees are more likely to stay and contribute for an extended period, put in all their efforts and working as a team generating synergies where the organization realizes more than it intends to.
B. Absence of second line leadership – In most NGOs, there is now an absence of a second line leadership. Most founders stay in both the board and in the management, refuses to let loose their hands of control and hardly promote second line leadership. In this case, the organization is as good as the person heading it. Some organizations, even larger ones, goes haywire when their leader suddenly expires, and the organization comes at the brink of shutting down. Needless to say, I have seen that too.
C. Gender disparity – Only a handful of NGOs are being led by women. Sometimes, it is so paradoxical to see that the organization working for women empowerment and feminist movements in the community does not have any women in their senior leadership positions and does not have an approach to give opportunities to women members.
D. Board Governance – A well-structured and engaged board of directors is essential. NGOs with strong governance ensure that the board is actively involved in oversight, decision-making, and supporting the organization's goal. The organization doesn't merely maintain a board in name, but rather, it ensures active engagement, selecting members who actively contribute, regularly attend meetings, and play substantive roles, rather than adopting a tokenistic approach.
2. Intent & Ethical leadership – A significant distinction lies between having a genuine intent to serve society and being primarily motivated by profit while operating under the non-profit facade. In this case, the intent and skills of the leader becomes very important. Skills are something which can be improved over time, but the intent should remain consistent over time. The leader’s intent is sometimes what drives the way for the organization, moistly smaller organizations, and sometimes the head of the organization works for their own rather than the communities they serve. Their primary intent becomes deriving benefits, sustaining, and improving their own lives rather than the communities. It is here where corruption can seep in, and the organization goes very far off their mission, vision and values.
3. Bold and Clear Strategic Vision & Mission – The NGO must have a clear vision and mission with defined goal in place. It should do what it intends to do and achieve over the next few years with effective monitoring processes in position. We come across several NGOs who engages themselves in almost everything because they want a share of every one’s pie and would engage donors to even write their proposals, with less or no inputs, agreeing to almost everything they are told to do. They lack a vision and do not care to check if the particular project aligns with their organization’s goal. They are more interested in preparing the budgets.
4. Right Attitude – NGOs should promote the right attitude within the organization amongst its employees and outside the organization with the communities with which they work. They should provide a space for the communities to participate, should listen to what they have to say and the changes they want to make and build it within the organization. Creating the right atmosphere within and outside the organization is very crucial.
5. Acquiring Knowledge & Skills – In the world of NGOs, stagnation is a silent killer. Knowledge and skill set are very important for an organization. Most organizations do not want to upgrade themselves and learn the new skills. They do not want to promote a learning environment and the employees are not provided a platform where they can participate, gain understanding, and acquire knowledge and then tend to improve the systems within the organization. An important characteristic of an organization should be that it should be open to learning and adapt to the changing circumstances and environment. It is already evident that those who do not change perish with time and close down very soon.
6. Networked Collaborations - The best way for an organization to grow and learn is to collaborate with others, getting into partnership with different campaigns and networks and learn and contribute therefore creating more opportunities to increase visibility to potential donors and highlight their work.
7. Transparency – Needless to say, the organization must be transparent in its approach, work, structure, and financial management. Transparency is the golden thread weaving trust. Some organisations are not transparent because they do not want to be transparent while some organisations fail to show or prove that they are transparent. Embracing transparency is a virtue that, when valued will attract donor in the long run, which many fail to understand while looking at the short-term gains.
In short, a non-governmental organization must be vibrant!

Comments

TRENDING

हिंदी आलोचना जैसे पिछड़ चुके अनुशासन की जगह हिंदी वैचारिकी का विकास जरूरी

- प्रमोद रंजन*   भारतीय राजनीति में सांप्रदायिक व प्रतिक्रियावादी ताकतों को सत्ता तक पहुंचाने में हिंदी पट्टी का सबसे बड़ा योगदान है। इसका मुख्य कारण हिंदी-पट्टी में कार्यरत समाजवादी व जनपक्षधर हिरावल दस्ते का विचारहीन, अनैतिक और  प्रतिक्रियावादी होते जाना है। अगर हम उपरोक्त बातों को स्वीकार करते हैं, तो कुछ रोचक निष्कर्ष निकलते हैं। हिंदी-जनता और उसके हिरावल दस्ते को विचारहीन और प्रतिक्रियावादी बनने से रोकने की मुख्य ज़िम्मेदारी किसकी थी?

ગુજરાતના સ્થાપના દિવસે યાદ કરીએ ભારતના વિશ્વપ્રસિદ્ધ ગુજરાતી પુરાતત્વવિદ્ ને

- ગૌરાંગ જાની*  આજે કોઈ ગુજરાતી એ કલ્પના પણ ન કરી શકે કે વર્ષ ૧૮૩૯ માં જૂનાગઢમાં જન્મેલા એક ગુજરાતી વિશ્વ પ્રસિદ્ધ બની શકે! પણ આપણે એ ગુજરાતીને કદાચ વિસરી ગયા છીએ જેમણે ગિરનારના અશોક શિલાલેખને દોઢસો વર્ષ પૂર્વે ઉકેલી આપ્યો.આ વિદ્વાન એટલે ભગવાનલાલ ઈન્દ્રજી. ૭ નવેમ્બર, ૧૮૩૯ ના દિવસે જૂનાગઢના પ્રશ્નોરા નાગર બ્રાહ્મણ પરિવારમાં તેમનો જન્મ થયો હતો. જૂનાગઢના એ સમયે અંગ્રેજી શિક્ષણની સગવડ ન હોવાને કારણે તેમને અંગ્રેજી ભાષાનું જ્ઞાન ન હતું પણ પાછળથી તેમણે ખપ પૂરતું અંગ્રેજી જાણી લીધું હતું.

Under Modi, democracy is regressing and economy is also growing slowly

By Avyaan Sharma*   India is "the largest democracy in the world", but now its democracy is regressing and its economy is also growing slowly. What has PM Modi's ten years in power brought us? Unemployment remains high. Joblessness is particularly high among India's youth - with those aged 15 to 29 making up a staggering 83% of all unemployed people in India, according to the "India Employment Report 2024", published last month by the International Labour Organisation (ILO) and the Institute of Human Development (IHD). The BJP-led government did not provide jobs to two crore youth in a year as was promised by Modi in the run up to the 2014 general elections.

नफरती बातें: मुसलमानों में असुरक्षा का भाव बढ़ रहा है, वे अपने मोहल्लों में सिमट रहे हैं

- राम पुनियानी*  भारत पर पिछले 10 सालों से हिन्दू राष्ट्रवादी भारतीय जनता पार्टी (भाजपा) राज कर रही है. भाजपा आरएसएस परिवार की सदस्य है और आरएसएस का लक्ष्य है हिन्दू राष्ट्र का निर्माण. आरएसएस से जुड़ी सैंकड़ों संस्थाएँ हैं. उसके लाखों, बल्कि शायद, करोड़ों स्वयंसेवक हैं. इसके अलावा कई हजार वरिष्ठ कार्यकर्ता हैं जिन्हें प्रचारक कहा जाता है. भाजपा के सत्ता में आने के बाद से आरएसएस दुगनी गति से हिन्दू राष्ट्र के निर्माण के अपने एजेण्डे को पूरा करने में जुट गया है. यदि भाजपा को चुनावों में लगातार सफलता हासिल हो रही है तो उसका कारण है देश में साम्प्रदायिकता और साम्प्रदायिक मुद्दों का बढ़ता बोलबाला. इनमें से कुछ हैं राम मंदिर, गौमांस और गोवध एवं लव जिहाद. 

Laxmanpur Bathe massacre: Perfect example of proto-fascist Brahmanical social order

By Harsh Thakor  The massacre at Laxmanpur-Bathe of Jehanabad in Bihar on the night of 1 December in 1997 was a landmark event with distinguishing features .The genocide rightly shook the conscience of the nation in the 50th year of Indian independence. The scale of the carnage was unparalleled in any caste massacre. It was a perfect manifestation of how in essence the so called neo-liberal state was in essence most autocratic. 

अगर भाजपा का पिछले दस साल का शासन तो ट्रेलर था तो अब क्या होगा!

- राम पुनियानी*  जहाँ तक प्रोपेगेंडा का सवाल है, हमारे प्रधानमंत्री का मुकाबला कम ही नेता कर सकते हैं. एक ओर वे कांग्रेस की कई घोषणाओं को सांप्रदायिक बता रहे हैं तो दूसरी ओर यह दावा भी कर रहे हैं कि उनके 10 साल के शासनकाल की उपलब्धियां शानदार और चमकदार तो हैं हीं मगर वे मात्र ट्रेलर हैं. और यह भी कि 2024 में उनकी सरकार फिर से बनने के बाद वे और बड़े काम करेंगे. उनके समर्थक उनकी सरकार की उपलब्धियों का गुणगान कर रहे हैं. मगर सच यह है कि उनकी सरकार ने कोई कमाल नहीं किया है.

कार्ल मार्क्स के जन्मदिन पर: दर्शन के क्षेत्र में इस महामानव की तीन अतुलनीय बातें

- अजय तिवारी  कोई व्यक्ति मार्क्सवादी हो या न हो, वह मार्क्सवाद विरोधी तब होता है,जब इतिहास को मानने से इनकार करता है।  दर्शन के क्षेत्र में मार्क्स की तीन बातें अतुलनीय हैं।

સરકારી તંત્ર અને લશ્કર પર કબજો કરવાનાં આર.એસ.એસ. ના ષડ્યંત્ર નો દસ્તાવેજ

- વાલજીભાઈ પટેલ  તા-૨૬/0૪ ના ઇન્ડિયન એક્સપ્રેસના એક લેખમાં આર..એસ.એસ.  દ્વારા સરકારી વહીવટી તંત્ર અને લશ્કર પર ચુપચાપ કાબુ કરવાના ષડ્યંત્રનાં પૂરાવાઓ રજુ થયા છે. મોદી સરકારના ૧૦ પ્રધાનોમાંથી ૭ પ્રધાનો માત્ર આર.એસ.એસ. નાં છે. રાજ્યોના ૧૦ ગવર્નરમાંથી ૪ ગવર્નરો આસ.એસ.એસ.ના પ્રચારક અને સ્વયંમસેવક છે. ભાજપ શાસિત ૧૨ રાજ્યોમાંથી ૮ રાજ્યોના મુખ્ય મંત્રીઓ અને નાયબ મુખ્ય મંત્રીઓ આર.એસ.એસ.ના સ્વયં સેવકો છે. વહીવટી તંત્રમાં ઉચ્ચ કક્ષાના અધિકારીઓમાં ચૂપચાપ આર.એસ.એસ.ના સ્વયંમસેવકો અને આર.એસ.એસ.ની વિચારધારાવાળા લોકોને ગોઠવી દેવામાં આવ્યા છે. 

કસ્ટોડિયલ ડેથ: રાજકોટ જિલ્લા કલેક્ટર, પોલીસ કમિશ્નરને રાષ્ટ્રીય માનવ અધિકાર આયોગની નોટિસ

- પ્રતિનિધિ દ્વારા  માનવ અધિકાર કાર્યકર્તા કાંતિલાલ પરમાર દ્વારા કસ્ટોડિયલ ડેથમા મરનારના માનવ અધિકાર ભંગની ફરિયાદ દિલ્હી માનવ અધિકાર આયોગમાં કરવામાં આવેલ હતી. રાજકોટ કસ્ટોડિયલ ડેથ કેસમાં અનુસૂચિત જાતિના યુવાન હમીરભાઇ ઉર્ફે ગોપાલભાઈ દેવજીભાઈ રાઠોડની પોલીસ દ્વારા ગેરકાયદેસર પોલીસ કસ્ટડીમાં લઇ ઢોર માર મારી કરાયેલ હત્યાના બનાવમાં રાષ્ટ્રીય માનવ અધિકાર આયોગ, દિલ્હીમાં માનવ અધિકાર ભંગની ફરિયાદ દાખલ કરવામાં આવતા આયોગે ઘટનાને ગંભીરતાથી લઇ તાત્કાલિક આ મુદ્દે રાજકોટના જિલ્લા કલેક્ટર અને રાજકોટ શહેર પોલીસ કમિશ્નરને નોટિસ ફટકારી આઠ અઠવાડીમાં એક્શન ટેક્ન રિપોર્ કરેલ કાર્યવાહીનો અહેવાલ માંગેલ છે.

BJP insulted lotus, a symbol of peace and prosperity, has used unfair coercion

By Kvita Sharma*  The symbol of the BJP is the lotus, which is regarded as a symbol of peace and prosperity. But the BJP does not have the qualities of Lotus. It has also frequently launched violence in many states and used unfair coercion to harm other parties in exchange for votes.