Skip to main content

Now hundred years old, the Communist Party of Norway needs to be reconstituted

By Harsh Thakor 

On 4th of November, the 100-year anniversary of the Communist Party of Norway (NKP) was observed. Multiple events took place on the anniversary, with communists and revolutionaries from Norway as well as other countries participating.
The event inaugurating the day was a seminar on the history of the Communist Party of Norway and the necessity of its reconstitution. There were also greetings presented at the seminar, from the International Communist League.
The Communist Party of Norway was founded the 4th of November 1923, as the Norwegian section of the Communist International, after it underwent a hard two-line struggle in The Norwegian Labour Party. As an integrated part of the International Communist Movement and under the leadership of Lenin and e Stalin, the Party forged together thousands of workers in Norway into a cohesive force in hard struggles. The Communist Party of Norway is the organized vanguard of the working class in Norway and will lead the proletariat in struggle until Communism.
In the period 1970-1975 the revisionist degeneration of the Party was the precursor of some important events: First the vanguard of the left in the Party was expelled through criminal processes, then the Party was dissolved to promote the new Socialist Left Party (SV), with the majority of the Party’s members joining this social-democratic project, and finally the Party was “reconstituted” in 1975 as a Brezhnevist Party, that upheld the leadership of the social-fascist and social-imperialist “CPSU”.
Thus the “NKP” of today can is devoid of the characteristics’ a real Communist Party, Only the Communist Party can lead the class struggle of the proletariat, unite the working people around the proletariat, and lead the socialist revolution to victory, establish the dictatorship of the proletariat and lead the development of the society onward through cultural revolutions until Communism. New Democratic and Socialist Revolutions are imperative to terminate the imperialist system that inflicts on the world, war, starvation, poverty and misery, and plant seeds for the classless communist society.

The legacy and history of the party

The modern proletariat crystallised in Norway during the 1800-hundreds in line with advent of industrialization, particularly in the second half, where the proletariat organized it self in unions and eventually established the first Labour Party in the country.
The left in the Norwegian Labor Party (DNA) captured the leadership in 1918, in an international and national form marked by the World War, the October Revolution, and established a powerful workers’ council movement in our country. Under the leadership of the left, the Labor Party became a member of the Communist International in 1919. But the the right opportunists, under the leadership of Martin Tranmæl, gave a crippling blow to the resolutions of the Communist International. Tranmæl masked his arguments in “left”-radical phrases, but the content was right opportunism. His main demand was “national independence” for the Party, which the right opportunists propagated in opposition to internationalism and democratic centralism in the International.
Several years of bitter struggle entangling struggle between the left and right opportunism in the DNA lead in the end to a split on the extraordinary national conference on the 2nd to 4th of November, 1923. The right opportunists used trumpcard on nationalism in the form of autonomism and a demand of “self determination” from the Comintern and was for a one sided focus on economic struggle, against proletarian discipline and democratic centralism and pitted the masses up against the leadership by slandering them. The left in the Party tried, together with the center, to arrive at a compromise, but the Tranmæl-wing sought splitting 
The armed proletariat was engaged in direct struggle against the enemy in Germany, only four years after the social democrats murdered the great communist leaders Luxemburg and Liebknecht in 1919, and the conference took place only barely two weeks after the red uprising in Hamburg. Thousands of red workers, men, women and children, sat in the concentration camps of the enemy on Finland. The young Soviet State courageously battled against terror and isolation campaigns. Amidst this development the right advocated DNA abandoning its post, its place in the ranks, and split the political unity of the working class.
The struggle in DNA did not take place isolated from this broader context. The Communist Party of Norway was from birth a baby of the international struggle against reaction, imperialism and revisionism. A large minority at the national conference of the DNA rejected right-opportunism and social-chauvinism. The left, who represented the proletariat, chose the Communist International and the International Proletariat, left the split conference, and organised themselves on the 4th of November as the first conference of the Communist Party of Norway, Norwegian section of the Communist International.
From the first moment the Party integrated in great struggles and organized a large chunk of the deepest and broadest masses in Norway. The communists played a constructive role in the iron strike in 1923. In the Menstad battle in Skien in June 1931, the communisst led a militant demonstration of 2000 workers that confronted strikebreakers and police. When the red workers triumphed the bourgeois State installed military departments to crush the struggle. Leading members of the Party were thrown in prison.
NKP organized thousands of working class women in the housewife associations,with many going on to become Party members. The Party united its self with the working class women as a champion of women’s rights, particularly economical and social rights that have been very important for the masses of working class women. The Party also played an instrumental role in organizing the struggle of the forest workers in the poorest parts of the country, particularly Hedmark.
During the Second World War and the fascist occupation, the Party had 200 members martyred in struggle against fascist occupation. Thousands of communists and revolutionaries were sent to the concentration camps of the Nazis. Among the patronisers of Hitler-fascism in this injustice, as well as the genocide against Norwegian Jews and the oppression and persecution of countless other anti-fascists, was the Norwegian bourgeois police, the Norwegian bourgeois State, Norwegian capitalists that collaborated during the war, and the social democratic governments before, during, and after the war. The social-democratic governments, in collaboration with Yankee Imperialism and British Imperialism, persecuted communists, quelled the resistance, organized snitching in large scale, and perpetrated the suppression of revolutionaries and communists after the war. The social-democratic leaders did this manifesting the international conspiracy against the Soviet Union.

Revisionism liquidates the Party

During the Second World War the revisionist Peder Furubotn usurped the central apparatus of the Party. From the position of non-elected “chairman” of the Party, he liquidated the army of the Party, the National Guard, and sabotaged the active resistance led by Asbjørn Sunde (comrade Osvald). Furubotn liquidated the independence of the Party by yielding to the bourgeois resistance front and the Labour Party government in London. His line was nationalist, and after the war he manifested a compromising path for peace with the class enemy, “reconstruction”, and increased “productivity”. His revisionism and opportunism was exposed by Stalin and the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, and the NKP initiated a reckoning with the Furubotn-clique. This clique functioned as a faction in the Party, and consistently violated the democratic centralism. Their line was exposed as bourgeois-nationalist and Titoist, and in 1949 Furubotn and his cronies were driven out of the Party after undertaking hard two-line struggle.
The cooperation with Furubotn did not crystallise sufficiently, and when Khrushchev snatched over the power in the Communist Party of the Soviet Union with the death of Stalin in 1953, and consolidated revisionism in power of the Party with the Party Congress in 1956, the leadership of the Communist Party of Norway was not able to admit the modern revisionism. Instead the Party leadership became a revisionist center in the Norwegian Party. Despite sustained resistance from the left, lead by genuine communists like Kjell Hovden, Esther Bergerud, and comrade Osvald, revisionism and opportunism tightened its hold on the Party leadership. 
The left won a temporary victory in 1967, in the struggle against the Vogt-wing in the Party leadership, that aspired a more revisionist line, but in 1970 the leaders of the left inside the Party was excluded. These had already reorganized under the name Marxist-Leninist Front (MLF), and raised the struggle to create a real Communist Party. MLF became a part of the new «Marxist-Leninist Movement» that also MLG and SUF (m-l) were a part of. 
There was hard two-line struggle within this movement from the start. A petty-bourgeois clique springing out from SUF (m-l) won the leadership in the movement, and lead the founding of the AKP (m-l) [Workers Communist Party (Marxist-Leninist)] in 1973. During few years these unfurled themselves as revisionists, and the revisionist development of AKP (m-l) culminated in the period from 1977 to 1984, where the Party plunged into a deep crisis. The Party leadership supported the revisionist Hua-Deng-gang when they usurped the power in the Communist Party of China in 1976. The national conference of the AKP(m-l) adopted a throughout revisionist Party program in 1984.
Marxists must project the left in the “ML-Movement” that left no stone unturned in combating revisionism and right opportunism. MLF struggled against the nationalism in the AKP (m-l), and for a Party based on the proletariat. The left of the AKP (m-l) struggled against trends inclining towards elections, dissolution of democratic centralism, reformism, bureaucratism and other manifestations of the revisionist line in the leadership. The final degeneration of the AKP (m-l) was first accomplished in 2007, when the Party was liquidated in favour of the Social Democratic Party.
Without a correct understanding of the Party, one does not imbibe that the Communist Party of Norway, founded on the 4th of November, 1923, was a Marxist-Leninist Party and Norwegian section of the Communist International was the exclusive Party of the proletariat. The Party is already founded, and thus cannot be founded again. The historical and political task for the communists it therefore not to found a “Communist Party”, but to reconstitute the Communist Party of Norway.
Revisionism is a form of bourgeois ideology which was verified by Lenin.. After Marxism had established control over the worker’s movement, bourgeois socialism permeated the movement as revised “Marxism”. With Khrushchev and Brezhnev this repeated itself in the CPSU and the International Communist Movement. Modern revisionism was disguised as “Marxism-Leninism”. After the coup in China in 1976 by the Hua-Deng-clique, modern revisionism in China disguised “Mao Tse-Tung Thought”. Today it is all the more important to resurrect the Communist Party, in context of confronting tide of neo-fascism, which has escalated on an unprecedented scale.

Wrong trends

Erroneously Maoist group Red Banner and International Communist League glorifies ‘Gonzalo thought’ and Chairman Gonzalo, failing to recognise gross errors and eclecticism of Communist Party of Peru. It advocates the un –Marxist trend of militarisation of the Party and Universality of Protracted peoples War, making it applicable in developed countries. like Norway.
One must admire Red Banner’s vociferous denouncement of revisionism historically and today, and relentlessly shimmering the banners of Marx, Lenin, Stalin and Mao and upholding Maoism when counter revolutionary wind is blowing in full swing. However it fails to comprehend how militarisation of Party, destroys it’s vanguard essence, turning it into a military organisation or combining role of Party with red army.
Red Banner also fails to uphold Chairman Mao’s contribution as an integral part and continuation of Marxism-Leninism., treating it as a separate entity. It equates peoples war, with establishment of Communism, which again violates essence of Leninism or proletarian ideology. Red Banner and ICL propagate concept of ‘Principally Maoism’ which negates s contribution of Marx and Lenin.
---
*Freelance journalist

Comments

TRENDING

Loktantra Bachao Abhiyan raises concerns over Jharkhand Adivasis' plight in Assam, BJP policies

By Our Representative  The Loktantra Bachao Abhiyan (Save Democracy Campaign) has issued a pressing call to protect Adivasi rights in Jharkhand, highlighting serious concerns over the treatment of Jharkhandi Adivasis in Assam. During a press conference in Ranchi on November 9, representatives from Assam, Chhattisgarh, and Madhya Pradesh criticized the current approach of BJP-led governments in these states, arguing it has exacerbated Adivasi struggles for rights, land, and cultural preservation.

Promoting love or instilling hate and fear: Why is RSS seeking a meeting with Rahul Gandhi?

By Ram Puniyani*  India's anti-colonial struggle was marked by a diverse range of social movements, one of the most significant being Hindu-Muslim unity and the emergence of a unified Indian identity among people of all religions. The nationalist, anti-colonial movement championed this unity, best embodied by Mahatma Gandhi, who ultimately gave his life for this cause. Gandhi once wrote, “The union that we want is not a patched-up thing but a union of hearts... Swaraj (self-rule) for India must be an impossible dream without an indissoluble union between the Hindus and Muslims of India. It must not be a mere truce... It must be a partnership between equals, each respecting the religion of the other.”

A Marxist intellectual who dwelt into complex areas of the Indian socio-political landscape

By Harsh Thakor*  Professor Manoranjan Mohanty has been a dedicated advocate for human rights over five decades. His work as a scholar and activist has supported revolutionary democratic movements, navigating complex areas of the Indian socio-political landscape. His balanced, non-partisan approach to human rights and social justice has made his books essential resources for advocates of democracy.

Four J&K MLAs visit Wular lake, pledge support to fisher community, environmental conservation

By Shamim Ahmed*   In a historic meeting that highlighted both environmental and social concerns, four Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) visited Wular Lake to meet with the fisherfolk community, signaling a significant step in addressing their longstanding issues. This gathering, organized with the support of dedicated advocates, marks a strengthening of efforts to both safeguard the lake’s ecosystem and support the community’s welfare.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Supreme Court’s dismissal of PIL on Covid vaccine safety is counter to known science and mathematics

By Bhaskaran Raman*  On 14 Oct 2024, the Supreme Court of India dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) on the side-effects of the Covid vaccine. In 2021, the world saw the rollout of various Covid vaccine candidates. In India, Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin and Serum Institute of India’s Covishield were rolled out. Covishield was nothing but Oxford’s AstraZeneca relabelled in India. The importance of open-minded and scientific probe of Covid vaccine safety In 2020/2021, all Covid vaccines were authorized for emergency use, which meant that the necessary efficacy and safety follow-up was incomplete at that time. The originally approved trials – called randomised controlled trials (RCT) had a “vaccine” group and a “placebo” group for comparison. Such experimental comparison/control is the cornerstone of the scientific method – which even children learn in photosynthesis experiments in class-1. The vaccine trials were scheduled to conclude in late 2022/early 2023. For instance, Covax...

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah  The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Right-arm fast bowler who helped West Indies shape arguably greatest Test team in cricket history

By Harsh Thakor*  Malcolm Marshall redefined what it meant to be a right-arm fast bowler, challenging the traditional laws of biomechanics with his unique skill. As we remember his 25th death anniversary on November 4th, we reflect on the legacy he left behind after his untimely death from colon cancer. For a significant part of his career, Marshall was considered one of the fastest and most formidable bowlers in the world, helping to shape the West Indies into arguably the greatest Test team in cricket history.

Will Left victory in Sri Lanka deliver economic sovereignty plan, go beyond 'tired' IMF agenda?

By Atul Chandra, Vijay Prashad*  On September 22, 2024, the Sri Lankan election authority announced that Anura Kumara Dissanayake of the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP)-led National People’s Power (NPP) alliance won the presidential election. Dissanayake, who has been the leader of the left-wing JVP since 2014, defeated 37 other candidates, including the incumbent president Ranil Wickremesinghe of the United National Party (UNP) and his closest challenger Sajith Premadasa of the Samagi Jana Balawegaya. 

Unlike other revolutionaries, Hindutva icon wrote 5 mercy petitions to British masters

By Shamsul Islam*  The Hindutva icon VD Savarkar of the RSS-BJP rulers of India submitted not one, two,or three but five mercy petitions to the British masters! Savarkarites argue: “There are no evidences to prove that Savarkar collaborated with the British for his release from jail. In fact, his appeal for release was a ruse. He was well aware of the political developments outside and wanted to be part of it. So he kept requesting for his release. But the British authorities did not trust him a bit” (YD Phadke, ‘A complex Hero’, "The Indian Expres"s, August 31, 2004)