Skip to main content

Freedom of religion, belief of a persecuted community: Rohingiyas - contextual analysis

By Rachel Irene D’Silva 

Human Rights are universal, to live free and in equality and dignity is right of all persons, all over and all times. Freedom of Religion is given to all persons living in India. People have the right to religious and non- religious belief, manifest and practice religion. The Freedom of Religion safeguards against discrimination or coercion by State and non- state actors. Rohingyas are the world’s most persecuted minority. Their religious affiliation is basically belonging to Muslims. In order to grapple with the context of Freedom of Religion and Belief the situation of human rights for Rohingyas must be seen as a cause for their displacement and migration to other countries. Soon after the military crackdown on Rohingyas in 2017, millions of them were forced to flee at once and become refugees. Kan Kya was one of the 400 villages destroyed by the Myanmar military in 2017 as per Human Rights Watch according to analyzed satellite images. Says the religious leader, former chairman of a village near Kan Kya, the Myanmar government intention is that we do not return.
The United Nations has started to study the impact of government policies on villagers and returning refugees after the Arakan Rohingya National Organization – UK based Rohingya rights group complained to the United Nations about removal of village names. Yanghee Lee, former UN Human rights envoy to Myanmar said, the government by making it purposely made it hard for refugees to return to places with no name and no evidence they lived there found this as way of exterminating their basic identity. And, the Rohingyas in Bangladesh said they will not return to Myanmar to be confined to camps after their return visit to encourage their voluntary repatriation to Myanmar.
Early warning project 2022 determines the possibility or onset of mass killing marks India as country of high risk because of its large population, its history of mass killing, its geographic region (South and Central Asia), and the presence of battle related deaths (Armed conflicts), and Kashmir insurgents. The report shows the country’s Muslim minority face government’s systematic discrimination and violence met with impunity and restriction of Muslims rights. Through hate speech by Hindu nationalist leaders and religious leaders Muslims there were calls for mass killings of Muslims. Large scale violent incidents targeting Muslims which involved Hindu nationalist processions engaging in derogatory anti-Muslim chants and desecration of mosques. Bull-zing Muslim owned properties across several states. Abuses in disputed Muslim majority territory of Jammu and Kashmir. Christians and Dalits continue to face violence and discrimination.
The International Freedom of Religion and Belief in India in the present times is severely violated by State and non- State actors. Minorities, Dalits and tribal people face discrimination in society. When religion intersects with gender, race, class, caste for instance, during the police interrogation (State) people have suffered from violation of FORB. The second issue is the limitation or restriction on FORB for example the laws (State) against the freedom to religious conversions. Third issue is the right to life and security of minorities due to the instances of hate crimes. The fourth issue is the Freedom from discrimination and coercion by laws that lead to feeling of discrimination among the Muslim community or religious minorities, for example Citizenship Act. Conflicts resulted in death of Hindus and Sikhs in Kashmir valley and vandalism against facilities of Muslims such as shops, houses. The last issue is failure or inability to safeguard the human rights in the society of all people that are seen in outcomes of mob lynching.
The context of the minorities in South Asia, the discrimination on the basis of religion, arrests are an issue of FORB connected to the Freedom from Discrimination, example journalist from Kerala faced arrest he was forced to become victim of discrimination. Pehlu Khan, a Muslim cow vendor was lynched on suspicion of beef. These social hostilities and extremist violence affected men from particular religion.
In the context of India, the restrictions to religious conversions are stringent and not the solution that is appropriate to handle the problem of freedom to convert. For example, according to the US Department of State report, “Ten of 28 states have laws restricting religious conversions. Four state governments have laws imposing penalties against so-called forced religious conversions for the purpose of marriage although some state high courts have dismissed cases charged under this law.”
According to the report, “In addition, during the year the government suspended FCRA licenses of 179 NGOs, including some that were faith-based.” which stretched the condition of a “reasonable limitation” on Freedom of Religion. The context of India shows that the “Right to Life and Security” of people from different religious and spiritual traditions faces threat due to rising hate crimes and attacks on religious festivals, gathering or individuals. According to the Report by US Department of State, “Some NGOs reported that the government failed to prevent or stop attacks on religious minorities. A faith-based NGO stated in its annual report that out of 112 complaints of violence filed by Christian victims from January to August, police filed official reports (First Information Report or FIR) in 25 cases. There were no updates on these cases by the end of the year.”
Freedom of Religion and Belief and conflicts, The US Department of State Report said that “The most recent National Crime Record Bureau (NCRB) report, Crime in India for 2020, released in September, said that the violence in New Delhi in February 2020 following passage of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and National Register of Citizens (NRC) resulted from a “feeling of discrimination” among the Muslim community.” The US Department of State Report has said that violence against the religious minorities. This means that conflicts in society over FORB have manifested in India.
The state’s duty bound morally and legally to protect persons from violations on the basis of religion or belief. Minorities and vulnerable groups in India face disadvantage in society due to social and economic factors. This affects the Freedom of Religion and Belief widely. Due to social and economic factors vulnerable Muslim men and tribals were attacked on suspicion of cattle. The vulnerable groups were affected by the political plunder. In the spur of the moment, religious heads, political leaders made inflammatory speech. These attacks against minorities were not countered effectively by the State and few of them were taken seriously.
In India, Refugees have historically been accepted by the State. Countries in turmoil sent refugees to India and people of different religions and faiths were believed to have come to India. Some of the examples of refugees were Tibetan fleeing the invasion of Tibet. The refugees from Afghanistan came to India and the Sri Lankan Tamils fleeing the ethnic conflict in their home have been seeking refuge. About 40,000 Rohingyas are living as protracted conditions as refugees in India.

Institutional violence and complicity

With reference to Freedom of Religion and Belief of Rohingyas in India this section reflects on the prevailing culture in Indian society. The Indian society has for centuries survived as a multicultural society, accepting all faiths. India constitutionally is secular State. The Freedom of Religion is protected Constitutionally under Articles 25, 26 and 27. In India, Rohingyas are lacking effectively legal protection and they are also stateless persons. The OCHR termed them as “stateless and statusless”. India, did not sign the International Refugee Law to refugees. Refugees are presently being supported by UNHCR.
The complicity of State in showing discrimination on the grounds of religion are documented by the human rights defenders. As a most recent pronouncement by the State was in 2020, as there were plans to deport them from India. As a group they are legally protected by International Law frameworks from non-refoulement by being refugees.

Impact of contextual factors on communities in Delhi and Haryana

In order to analyze the impact of structural factors in relation with Freedom of Religion and Belief of individuals and communities. Structural violence harms other rights such as housing, work, citizenship, identity, conversion, justice, land, clothes, travel, education, health, land, inheritance and language.
In this regard the Rohingya community in Delhi and Haryana was visited and the situation showed that refugee children were living in settlements that are unfit for living. Their right to shelter was severely affected and basic needs such as access to education, water and sanitation in the settlements are affected.

Identity of minorities

In January 2019, UNHCR India acknowledged the presence of 18,000 Rohingyas which are registered. In a dominant culture Rohingyas are subjugated socially and culturally. Visiting the refugee camps and discussing with refugees brought out the prevailing sense of discrimination, risks and surveillance as part of the state of exception that these refugees are subjected on daily basis in the settlements. For instance, their freedom of movement and other rights are restricted. They could be seen as becoming institutional victims of nationalism, racism, religious bias, ignorance, class discrimination and other social formations.

Conclusion

This study has made an attempt to assess persecution of Rohingyas, world’s most persecuted minority in a contextual framework in India. With reference to Freedom of Religion and Belief the most basic rights of individuals and communities are affected by more powerful sections of society and Indian State. These are right to work, right to life and security, freedom from discrimination, freedom from coercion and right to worship. This affects the peaceful co-existence of migrants and refugees with other communities and cultures in the society. It affects access to justice and access to healthcare of individuals which are harmful for meeting sustainable development goals. It has a negative effect on rule of law and citizenship for promoting diversity and gender equality. Promoting greater individual and group rights and respect for all faiths and cultures will empower the minorities in this present context.
---
References
  • Paul, R. (2023, May 6). Rohingyas say will not go home to Myanmar to be stuck in camps.
  • Pherson, P. M. (2020, September 11). Three years after exodus, Myanmar erases names of Rohingya villages, U.N. map makers follow suit.
  • State, U. D. (2021). US Department of State Report 2021 on International Religious Freedom in India.

Comments

TRENDING

हिंदी आलोचना जैसे पिछड़ चुके अनुशासन की जगह हिंदी वैचारिकी का विकास जरूरी

- प्रमोद रंजन*   भारतीय राजनीति में सांप्रदायिक व प्रतिक्रियावादी ताकतों को सत्ता तक पहुंचाने में हिंदी पट्टी का सबसे बड़ा योगदान है। इसका मुख्य कारण हिंदी-पट्टी में कार्यरत समाजवादी व जनपक्षधर हिरावल दस्ते का विचारहीन, अनैतिक और  प्रतिक्रियावादी होते जाना है। अगर हम उपरोक्त बातों को स्वीकार करते हैं, तो कुछ रोचक निष्कर्ष निकलते हैं। हिंदी-जनता और उसके हिरावल दस्ते को विचारहीन और प्रतिक्रियावादी बनने से रोकने की मुख्य ज़िम्मेदारी किसकी थी?

नफरती बातें: मुसलमानों में असुरक्षा का भाव बढ़ रहा है, वे अपने मोहल्लों में सिमट रहे हैं

- राम पुनियानी*  भारत पर पिछले 10 सालों से हिन्दू राष्ट्रवादी भारतीय जनता पार्टी (भाजपा) राज कर रही है. भाजपा आरएसएस परिवार की सदस्य है और आरएसएस का लक्ष्य है हिन्दू राष्ट्र का निर्माण. आरएसएस से जुड़ी सैंकड़ों संस्थाएँ हैं. उसके लाखों, बल्कि शायद, करोड़ों स्वयंसेवक हैं. इसके अलावा कई हजार वरिष्ठ कार्यकर्ता हैं जिन्हें प्रचारक कहा जाता है. भाजपा के सत्ता में आने के बाद से आरएसएस दुगनी गति से हिन्दू राष्ट्र के निर्माण के अपने एजेण्डे को पूरा करने में जुट गया है. यदि भाजपा को चुनावों में लगातार सफलता हासिल हो रही है तो उसका कारण है देश में साम्प्रदायिकता और साम्प्रदायिक मुद्दों का बढ़ता बोलबाला. इनमें से कुछ हैं राम मंदिर, गौमांस और गोवध एवं लव जिहाद. 

देशव्यापी ग्रामीण भारत बंध में उतरे मध्य प्रदेश के आदिवासी, किया केंद्र सरकार का विरोध

- हरसिंग जमरे, भिखला सोलंकी, रतन अलावे*  15 और 16 फरवरी को निमाड के बड़वानी, खरगोन और बुरहानपुर में जागृत आदिवासी दलित संगठन के नेतृत्व में आदिवासी महिला-पुरुषों ग्रामीण भारत बंद में रैली एवं विरोध प्रदर्शन किया । प्रधान मंत्री द्वारा 2014 में फसलों की लागत का डेढ़ गुना भाव देने का वादा किया गया था, 2016 में किसानों की आय दुगना करने का वादा किया गया था । आज, फसलों का दाम नहीं बढ़ रहा है, लेकिन खेती में खर्च बढ़ता जा रहा है! खाद, बीज और दवाइयों का दाम, तीन-चार गुना बढ़ चुका है! किसानों को लागत का डेढ़ गुना भाव देने के बजाए, खेती को कंपनियों के हवाले करने के लिए 3 काले कृषि कानून लाए गए । 3 काले कानून वापस लेते समय प्रधान मंत्री ने फिर वादा किया था कि फसलों की लागत का डेढ़ गुना भाव की कानूनी गारंटी के लिए कानून बनाएँगे, लेकिन वो भी झूठ निकला! आज जब देश के किसान दिल्ली में आपको अपना वादा याद दिलाने आए है, तब आप उनका रास्ता रोक रहें है, उनके साथ मारपीट कर उन पर आँसू गैस फेंक रहें हैं, उन पर छर्रों से फायरिंग कर रहें है! देश को खिलाने वाला किसान खुद भूखा रहे, क्या यही विकास है?

Under Modi, democracy is regressing and economy is also growing slowly

By Avyaan Sharma*   India is "the largest democracy in the world", but now its democracy is regressing and its economy is also growing slowly. What has PM Modi's ten years in power brought us? Unemployment remains high. Joblessness is particularly high among India's youth - with those aged 15 to 29 making up a staggering 83% of all unemployed people in India, according to the "India Employment Report 2024", published last month by the International Labour Organisation (ILO) and the Institute of Human Development (IHD). The BJP-led government did not provide jobs to two crore youth in a year as was promised by Modi in the run up to the 2014 general elections.

આદર્શ સાંસદ ગ્રામ યોજના ના 106 દત્તક ગામો પૈકી કોઈ પણ ગામનું સોશ્યલ ઓડિટ થયું નથી

- પંક્તિ જોગ  આદર્શ સાંસદ ગ્રામ યોજના  ઓકટોબર 2014 થી અમલ માં છે. આ યોજનાં મૂજબ 2019-2024 દરમ્યાન ગુજરાત ના 26 સાંસદોએ 130 ગામો દત્તક લેવાના થતા હતાં. 

ગુજરાતના સ્થાપના દિવસે યાદ કરીએ ભારતના વિશ્વપ્રસિદ્ધ ગુજરાતી પુરાતત્વવિદ્ ને

- ગૌરાંગ જાની*  આજે કોઈ ગુજરાતી એ કલ્પના પણ ન કરી શકે કે વર્ષ ૧૮૩૯ માં જૂનાગઢમાં જન્મેલા એક ગુજરાતી વિશ્વ પ્રસિદ્ધ બની શકે! પણ આપણે એ ગુજરાતીને કદાચ વિસરી ગયા છીએ જેમણે ગિરનારના અશોક શિલાલેખને દોઢસો વર્ષ પૂર્વે ઉકેલી આપ્યો.આ વિદ્વાન એટલે ભગવાનલાલ ઈન્દ્રજી. ૭ નવેમ્બર, ૧૮૩૯ ના દિવસે જૂનાગઢના પ્રશ્નોરા નાગર બ્રાહ્મણ પરિવારમાં તેમનો જન્મ થયો હતો. જૂનાગઢના એ સમયે અંગ્રેજી શિક્ષણની સગવડ ન હોવાને કારણે તેમને અંગ્રેજી ભાષાનું જ્ઞાન ન હતું પણ પાછળથી તેમણે ખપ પૂરતું અંગ્રેજી જાણી લીધું હતું.

सफाई कर्मियों का निवाला दाव पर! अब मुद्दा आधारित एकता ही एकमात्र रास्ता!

- संजीव डांडा*   दिल्ली में सफाई कर्मी रोजगार के आभाव में अब भुखमरी का का सामना कर रहे हैं । सरकार उनकी समस्या का समाधान करने में असमर्थ है । आज कॉन्स्टिट्यूशन क्लब ऑफ इंडिया, नई दिल्ली में आयोजित मीटिंग में दिल्ली के सीवर कर्मचारियों और कचरा बीनने वालों ने अपने रोजगार के कई मुद्दे उठाए । बैठक का आयोजन सफाई कर्मचारियों, यूनियन के प्रतिनिधियों, शिक्षाविदों और सामाजिक कार्यकर्ताओं की सिफारिशों को सार्वजनिक करने के लिए किया गया था । इस बैठक में 200 से अधिक सीवर श्रमिकों और कचरा बीनने वालों ने भाग लिया और उनके सामने आने वाली आजीविका के संकट पर चर्चा की।

Laxmanpur Bathe massacre: Perfect example of proto-fascist Brahmanical social order

By Harsh Thakor  The massacre at Laxmanpur-Bathe of Jehanabad in Bihar on the night of 1 December in 1997 was a landmark event with distinguishing features .The genocide rightly shook the conscience of the nation in the 50th year of Indian independence. The scale of the carnage was unparalleled in any caste massacre. It was a perfect manifestation of how in essence the so called neo-liberal state was in essence most autocratic. 

BJP insulted lotus, a symbol of peace and prosperity, has used unfair coercion

By Kvita Sharma*  The symbol of the BJP is the lotus, which is regarded as a symbol of peace and prosperity. But the BJP does not have the qualities of Lotus. It has also frequently launched violence in many states and used unfair coercion to harm other parties in exchange for votes.

Opposition parties appear to have fallen into the trap of Modi-centric elections

By NS Venkataraman*                                          As India is now passing through parliamentary election with more than 950 million   citizens having right to exercise their franchise,  what is unique about this election is the widely believed foregone conclusion that Mr. Narendra Modi would win the election. As a matter of fact, most people do not say that BJP,   the party that Mr. Modi belongs to,  would win the election but restrict themselves to say that Mr. Modi would win the election.