Skip to main content

IFC withdraws funding for waste-to-energy incinerators in Gujarat: A win for civil society

 
In a significant victory for environmental activists and local communities, the International Finance Corporation (IFC), the private lending arm of the World Bank, has decided not to invest in the proposed $40 million funding for waste-to-energy (WTE) incineration plants in Gujarat, India. The decision comes after strong opposition from civil society organizations, which highlighted concerns over pollution, health risks, and violations of sustainable waste management practices.
The funding was intended to support Abellon Clean Energy Limited (ACEL) in building four WTE incinerators in Rajkot, Vadodara, Ahmedabad, and Jamnagar, processing 3,750 tons of unsegregated municipal solid waste daily. However, opposition groups, including 174 networks of activists worldwide, raised concerns that the project would worsen air and water pollution, endanger public health, and undermine India’s environmental regulations.
"We were initially told that these plants would convert waste into power, but instead, they have increased pollution and health issues in our communities," said Ker Jayendrasinh, an activist in Jamnagar. Another activist, Asmita Chavda from Ahmedabad, expressed relief at IFC’s decision but called for broader action: “This is a major victory, but other financial institutions must follow IFC’s lead and stop funding harmful WTE projects.”
Financial concerns also played a role in the IFC’s withdrawal. ACEL has been struggling with mounting losses, with its net profit falling from ₹11.1 crore in 2021 to a ₹19 crore loss in 2023. The company’s inability to cover its loan interest payments further raised doubts about its economic viability.
Environmental advocates now urge India’s Power Finance Corporation (PFC) and the Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency (IREDA) to reconsider their loans to ACEL. "This is an opportunity to shift towards more effective and sustainable waste management strategies," said Jay Vyas, an activist from Vadodara.
While the IFC’s decision marks a victory for environmental justice, campaigners emphasize that the fight is not over. They are calling for a complete shutdown of polluting WTE plants and a transition to decentralized, eco-friendly waste management solutions.

Comments

TRENDING

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual.  I don't know who owns this site, for there is nothing on it in the About Us link. It merely says, the Nashik Corporation  site   "is an educational and news website of the municipal corporation. Today, education and payment of tax are completely online." It goes on to add, "So we provide some of the latest information about Property Tax, Water Tax, Marriage Certificate, Caste Certificate, etc. So all taxpayer can get all information of their municipal in a single place.some facts about legal and financial issues that different city corporations face, but I was least interested in them."  Surely, this didn't interest...

Beyond the 'plum' posting: Why the caste lens still defines bureaucratic success

Following my recent blog on former IAS bureaucrat Atanu Chakraborty’s sudden exit as non-executive chairman of HDFC Bank, a few colleagues from the Gujarat cadre — mostly those I interacted with during my Gandhinagar stint (1997–2012) as the Times of India representative — reacted rather sharply. Most of them sent their responses directly on WhatsApp, touching upon on the merits and demerits of Chakraborty’s controversial move. One former IAS officer, a Dalit, however, went further, raising a broader question: why do some officials like Chakraborty secure plum post-retirement assignments, while others are overlooked?

Blaming RTE, not underfunding: Education groups hit back at NITI Aayog working paper

A preliminary working paper by Arvind Virmani, economist and member of the Government of India think tank NITI Aayog, has concluded that the Right to Education (RTE) Act — enacted to guarantee free and compulsory schooling for children between six and fourteen — has actually worsened learning outcomes rather than improved them. The paper, published in March 2026 and reported by The Print on 16 April, has drawn sharp pushback from education rights advocates, who argue it builds a politically motivated narrative against constitutionally guaranteed entitlements.