Skip to main content

Study claims Indian states follow a flawed ‘spend-tax’ model to overcome fiscal issues

 A new study analyzing the revenue-expenditure nexus of Indian states has revealed that state government spending drives tax revenue growth, supporting the ‘spend-tax’ hypothesis. Conducted by researchers Himani Baxi and Dhyani Mehta from Pandit Deendayal Energy University, the study used a panel Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach -- statistical technique used to analyze the long-term relationship between variables -- to examine fiscal trends across 29 Indian states from 1990 to 2022.
The research found that state expenditure positively impacts tax revenue in both the short and long run. A 10% increase in state spending leads to a 1% rise in tax revenue in the short term and an 1.8% increase in the long term. Additionally, state GDP growth significantly boosts tax revenue, with a 10% rise in GDP resulting in a tax revenue increase of 8% over the long term.
The findings challenge conventional fiscal theories that suggest taxation should determine spending. Instead, Indian states appear to spend first and then generate tax revenue to match expenditure needs. This contrasts with studies in other countries, where the tax-spend or fiscal synchronization models are more commonly observed.
However, the study highlights concerns over states’ growing dependence on central government tax transfers, which may weaken fiscal autonomy. It suggests that states should explore alternative revenue sources, such as non-tax revenues, and focus on efficient public service pricing to reduce dependency on central funds.
With rising infrastructure costs and the reintroduction of old pension schemes, the Reserve Bank of India has warned that controlling fiscal deficits will be increasingly difficult. The study emphasizes the need for a re-evaluation of fiscal decentralization policies to ensure sustainable state finances.
The research has been published in the International Journal of Social Economics and is expected to influence future discussions on state-level fiscal policies in India.

Comments

TRENDING

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual.  I don't know who owns this site, for there is nothing on it in the About Us link. It merely says, the Nashik Corporation  site   "is an educational and news website of the municipal corporation. Today, education and payment of tax are completely online." It goes on to add, "So we provide some of the latest information about Property Tax, Water Tax, Marriage Certificate, Caste Certificate, etc. So all taxpayer can get all information of their municipal in a single place.some facts about legal and financial issues that different city corporations face, but I was least interested in them."  Surely, this didn't interest...

Beyond the 'plum' posting: Why the caste lens still defines bureaucratic success

Following my recent blog on former IAS bureaucrat Atanu Chakraborty’s sudden exit as non-executive chairman of HDFC Bank, a few colleagues from the Gujarat cadre — mostly those I interacted with during my Gandhinagar stint (1997–2012) as the Times of India representative — reacted rather sharply. Most of them sent their responses directly on WhatsApp, touching upon on the merits and demerits of Chakraborty’s controversial move. One former IAS officer, a Dalit, however, went further, raising a broader question: why do some officials like Chakraborty secure plum post-retirement assignments, while others are overlooked?

Blaming RTE, not underfunding: Education groups hit back at NITI Aayog working paper

A preliminary working paper by Arvind Virmani, economist and member of the Government of India think tank NITI Aayog, has concluded that the Right to Education (RTE) Act — enacted to guarantee free and compulsory schooling for children between six and fourteen — has actually worsened learning outcomes rather than improved them. The paper, published in March 2026 and reported by The Print on 16 April, has drawn sharp pushback from education rights advocates, who argue it builds a politically motivated narrative against constitutionally guaranteed entitlements.