Skip to main content

Silicosis a public health emergency: Health rights leader calls for urgent national action

 
Jagdish Patel, Director of the health rights NGO Peoples Training and Research Centre, Vadodara, has called for urgent national action to address the deepening crisis of silicosis in India, terming it a public health emergency that has been continuously ignored. In an article published by the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics on June 21, 2025, Patel exposes the scale of state and institutional neglect toward occupational diseases, especially in India’s vast unorganised sector.
“Occupational health, in general and silicosis, specifically, is a public health emergency ignored for a long time as it is seen as a working-class issue not a public health problem,” writes Patel. He criticises the indifference of both the state and industry, stating, “Poor workers are a dispensable commodity, and their health is not of any importance to the state or to industry.”
Patel underscores how India, despite its ambitions to be a global economic leader, has failed to ensure basic health protections for millions of workers exposed to hazardous conditions. “We have no data on the burden of disease,” he notes. “Not only do we not have any credible data on occupational diseases, but we do not even have reliable estimates to compare with the actual data and the progress we have made, if any.”
He particularly draws attention to the fact that India has not ratified two key international labour conventions—the ILO Occupational Health and Safety Convention, 1981 (C.155) and the Promotional Framework for Occupational Safety and Health Convention (C.187). “If ratified, we will have to revise our laws accordingly,” Patel points out, adding that both conventions now form part of the fundamental set of ILO conventions which all member states are expected to adopt.
“Having legal protection is one thing and enforcement is another,” he remarks. He warns that without ratifying these conventions, India’s occupational health framework will remain fragmented, weak and largely unenforceable—especially as the new OSH Code, 2020 narrows legal coverage by raising the threshold of applicability to units employing 20 or more workers, thereby excluding millions of those most vulnerable.
Patel further notes that while a National Policy on Safety, Health and Environment at Workplace was announced in 2009, it remains largely on paper. “Prevention is an integral part of economic activities... but this has remained only on paper,” he says, calling for a renewed commitment to worker health as a pillar of national development.
Highlighting how widespread the problem of silicosis is, Patel points to various states and industrial zones—Khambhat, Morbi, Than, Godhra, and Kadi in Gujarat; sandstone mining in Rajasthan; glass factories in West Bengal; mining zones in Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, and Madhya Pradesh. He says the disease also affects family members of workers exposed to silica dust, especially when employers house them inside factory premises. “There is no law prohibiting them from providing accommodation for workers and their families inside the factory premises,” he writes, citing a case of a woman in Morbi who contracted silicosis simply by living on-site.
Despite Supreme Court directions in a 2006 PIL and multiple NHRC reports, most Indian states continue to ignore the silicosis crisis. “Only a handful of states — Gujarat, Rajasthan, West Bengal, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Haryana, Delhi and Madhya Pradesh — have reported silicosis in their states. There are sporadic reports from Telangana, Uttar Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir and Odisha, but no reports from states like Maharashtra, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Kerala or Bihar.”
Patel concludes with a sobering observation: “These are not election issues, and no political party can be influenced to take them up.” His article is a powerful indictment of the systemic failure to protect the health of Indian workers and a call to align national laws with international labour standards India has so far chosen not to ratify.

Comments

TRENDING

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual.  I don't know who owns this site, for there is nothing on it in the About Us link. It merely says, the Nashik Corporation  site   "is an educational and news website of the municipal corporation. Today, education and payment of tax are completely online." It goes on to add, "So we provide some of the latest information about Property Tax, Water Tax, Marriage Certificate, Caste Certificate, etc. So all taxpayer can get all information of their municipal in a single place.some facts about legal and financial issues that different city corporations face, but I was least interested in them."  Surely, this didn't interest...

Beyond the 'plum' posting: Why the caste lens still defines bureaucratic success

Following my recent blog on former IAS bureaucrat Atanu Chakraborty’s sudden exit as non-executive chairman of HDFC Bank, a few colleagues from the Gujarat cadre — mostly those I interacted with during my Gandhinagar stint (1997–2012) as the Times of India representative — reacted rather sharply. Most of them sent their responses directly on WhatsApp, touching upon on the merits and demerits of Chakraborty’s controversial move. One former IAS officer, a Dalit, however, went further, raising a broader question: why do some officials like Chakraborty secure plum post-retirement assignments, while others are overlooked?

Blaming RTE, not underfunding: Education groups hit back at NITI Aayog working paper

A preliminary working paper by Arvind Virmani, economist and member of the Government of India think tank NITI Aayog, has concluded that the Right to Education (RTE) Act — enacted to guarantee free and compulsory schooling for children between six and fourteen — has actually worsened learning outcomes rather than improved them. The paper, published in March 2026 and reported by The Print on 16 April, has drawn sharp pushback from education rights advocates, who argue it builds a politically motivated narrative against constitutionally guaranteed entitlements.