Skip to main content

Nation marks 10 years of Digital India, yet RTI filing with Parliament remains offline

   
As India commemorates a decade of the ambitious Digital India mission launched by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on July 1, 2015, a critical digital gap remains unaddressed: citizens still cannot file Right to Information (RTI) applications online with the Indian Parliament.
While the RTI Act, passed in 2005, empowers citizens to seek information from public authorities, there remains no online provision for submitting RTI queries to the Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha. This is despite the Central Government having launched the online RTI portal (www.rtionline.gov.in) more than a decade ago, facilitating e-filing of applications to most central ministries and departments.
However, Parliament — the very institution that enacted the RTI Act — is not covered under this portal. The Lok Sabha, designated as a “competent authority” under the RTI Act, is responsible for establishing its own rules and systems. To date, it has not set up a digital mechanism for RTI submission.
Ironically, the Digital Sansad platform (https://sansad.in/), created under the Digital India mission to make parliamentary proceedings more accessible, also lacks a link or facility to file RTI applications. No separate online RTI portal exists for Parliament either.
As a result, citizens are compelled to follow the outdated method of sending a physical application along with a ₹10 Indian Postal Order or Demand Draft to the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) at the Lok Sabha Secretariat in New Delhi. This process is time-consuming, expensive, and contradicts the eco-friendly and paperless vision of the Digital India initiative.
The RTI helpline operated by Mahiti Adhikar Gujarat Pahel (Phone: 9924085000) contacted the CPIO of the Lok Sabha Secretariat, who acknowledged that an online Sansad RTI portal is “in the process of development.” Until it becomes operational, the old physical filing method remains the only option.
Inquiries with the CPIO of the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs also revealed that citizens cannot file RTIs concerning Parliament through the central RTI portal either, further highlighting the administrative loophole.
“Even after 20 years of the RTI Act and 10 years of Digital India, Parliament has no provision for online RTI filing. It’s a glaring omission that questions the seriousness of the government’s commitment to digital transparency,” said Pankti Jog, Executive Secretary of Mahiti Adhikar Gujarat Pahel.
This digital exclusion of Parliament from the RTI ecosystem not only contradicts the core goals of the Digital India mission — such as easy access to services and reduced carbon footprint — but also undermines the constitutional right of citizens to seek information efficiently.

Comments

Post a Comment

NOTE: While there is no bar on viewpoint, comments containing hateful or abusive language will not be published and will be marked spam

TRENDING

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual.  I don't know who owns this site, for there is nothing on it in the About Us link. It merely says, the Nashik Corporation  site   "is an educational and news website of the municipal corporation. Today, education and payment of tax are completely online." It goes on to add, "So we provide some of the latest information about Property Tax, Water Tax, Marriage Certificate, Caste Certificate, etc. So all taxpayer can get all information of their municipal in a single place.some facts about legal and financial issues that different city corporations face, but I was least interested in them."  Surely, this didn't interest...
Post a Comment
»

Beyond the 'plum' posting: Why the caste lens still defines bureaucratic success

Following my recent blog on former IAS bureaucrat Atanu Chakraborty’s sudden exit as non-executive chairman of HDFC Bank, a few colleagues from the Gujarat cadre — mostly those I interacted with during my Gandhinagar stint (1997–2012) as the Times of India representative — reacted rather sharply. Most of them sent their responses directly on WhatsApp, touching upon on the merits and demerits of Chakraborty’s controversial move. One former IAS officer, a Dalit, however, went further, raising a broader question: why do some officials like Chakraborty secure plum post-retirement assignments, while others are overlooked?
3 comments
»

Blaming RTE, not underfunding: Education groups hit back at NITI Aayog working paper

A preliminary working paper by Arvind Virmani, economist and member of the Government of India think tank NITI Aayog, has concluded that the Right to Education (RTE) Act — enacted to guarantee free and compulsory schooling for children between six and fourteen — has actually worsened learning outcomes rather than improved them. The paper, published in March 2026 and reported by The Print on 16 April, has drawn sharp pushback from education rights advocates, who argue it builds a politically motivated narrative against constitutionally guaranteed entitlements.
Post a Comment
»