Skip to main content

Environmental damage due to improperly treated wastewater flowing into waterbodies

By Proshakha Maitra*, Megha Gupta*, Dr Mansee Bal Bhargava** 

According to the United Nations Water and other leading organisations like World Wide Fund for Nature, almost two-thirds of the world’s population could suffer from water shortage by 2025. We know that 97.5% of total world water available is in oceans (saltwater) and only 2.5% of freshwater resources are available throughout the globe. Meaning, the water resources are definite and not expanding unlike the rising water demands. The global situation of the water crisis where water consumption is constantly increasing along with the world population, humanity has reached a critical stage that it has pushed us to look into alternative sources of water recovery. An alternative source of water is addressed by treating wastewater and reusing it. Efficient wastewater treatment methods are becoming crucial to sustainably meet the needs of both the present and the future.
Wastewater or sewage is a mix of debris, chemicals, waste materials, excreta and discharges from residences, restaurants, hospitals, industries and many more, broadly termed as domestic and industrial wastewaters that flow into the surface waterbodies or seep into the ground. The surface runoff generated after rainfall also gets added to domestic and industrial wastewaters increasing the contamination in the waterbodies and groundwater. Since, most of the wastewater contain very high concentrations of fatal and toxic substances, the chemical and biological contaminations of water have increased significantly over the last few decades and have become a major threat to public health and safety besides the health of ecosystem (Crini & Lichtfouse, 2019).
We are in the times when water is becoming an increasingly scarce resource and wastewater is considered as a secondary source of water where it can be reused in several processes and purposes after proper treatment. Wastewater treatment has become crucial in the present times as the natural purifying processes of the environment are unable to keep pace with the number of pollutants produced by the society. The environmental sustainability now largely depends on the efficient and effective wastewater treatment to protect the health of the ecosystem, aid water recycling, provide alternate source of energy, besides ensuring better human health.

A Session on Wastewater Treatment and Environmental Sustainability

The Wednesdays.for.Water session organised by WforW Foundation on, ‘Wastewater Treatment and Environmental Sustainability’, focussed on the ongoing technological and ecosystem based wastewater treatments. The session invited Dr Kirti Yankie and Andrews Jacob as speakers. Dr Suparana Katyaini moderated the session. Dr Kirti Yenkie is an assistant professor at the Henry M Rowan College of Engineering, Rowan University, New Jersey. With 10+ years of experience in the Process Systems Engineering she is leading the Sustainable Design & Systems Medicine Lab at the university. Andrews Jacob is a senior project manager at Consortium for Dewats Dissemination Society, Bangalore. With 13+ years of experience as a water and sanitation professional, his focus is on planning and implementing nature-based solutions in wastewater management, faecal sludge management, water body rejuvenation, integrated urban water management, and solid waste management. Suparana Katyaini during this session was an assistant professor at the Tata Institute of Social Science Hyderabad. The video of the session is available here.

Engineering versus Nature-Based Solutions

According to Andrews, Sewage Treatment Plants (STPs) are the most common systems which are used to treat municipal and domestic wastewater. Despite their several benefits, STPs are largely plagued due to high operational expenditures which often lead to their closure. There are several problems with the current sewage treatment systems and most of these systems are highly chemical and energy intensive. A common challenge in the functioning of the STP comes from the developmental activities which are ongoing processes as, new households and buildings gradually come up which get difficult to link them to the existing STPs through underground drainage channels for the treatment of wastewater.
This is where a decentralised systems is advocated as an intelligent approach as, the wastewater can be effectively treated at individual households or community levels. The decentralised wastewater treatment (DEWATS) systems are more appropriate solutions as they can provide comprehensive coverage of wastewater systems up to the last mile. The Consortium for DEWATSTM Dissemination Society (CDD Society) provides such decentralised systems with nature-based techniques which further minimise the cost of operation as they are not dependent on chemicals or energy.
The Nature-based Solutions (NbS) offer effective solutions through the use of naturally available materials and thus are free from the use of any form of chemicals or energy. This is beneficial in cutting down costs and thus is a highly sustainable form of operation. While the NbS require greater area than conventional methods of wastewater treatment despite that the former have several benefits over the latter approach. For example, unlike the conventional systems, the NbS does not depend on electricity for their operations, further reducing the emission of CO2 into the environment.
A typical Decentralised Wastewater Treatment (DEWATS)
The nature-based treatment of wastewater mainly comprises three distinct steps. The first treatment or the primary stage includes a sedimentation tank (a kind of septic tank) and involves separation of water and solid where the solid particles are allowed to settle as sludge at the bottom of the tank. This stage is designed to remove up to 40% of the total solid particles present in the wastewater. It usually takes place in two chambers to increase the effectiveness. The second treatment of secondary stage is mostly biological and does not include any form of chemicals. It consists of four to six chambers and wastewater is passed in a series of up-flow chambers with filter materials (gravel, slag or plastic elements). This stage is purely anaerobic in which the water is kept in a suspended way where floating microbes can eat small organic matter. This stage is designed to treat about 75-85% of the present organic matter. The third treatment or the tertiary stage involves aerobic treatment of the water in a Planted Gravel Filter. The filter consists of plants such as, Cana Indica, and Colocasia besides materials such as, graded gravels or river pebbles that are soaked up to half a meter in the water. The treatment efficiency of this stage is around 9%.
DEWATS Treatment Steps
These stages of wastewater treatment can be modified and combined, depending on the quantity of water, anticipated number of pollutants, and other factors. For example, highly polluted domestic wastewater may require six chambers of anaerobic baffled reactors and filter tanks whereas, in a moderately polluted wastewater three chambers of anaerobic filter tank may be sufficient. The nature-based decentralised treatment of wastewater usually operates effectively over long period without much power requirements, heavy maintenance, and operational costs.
The CDD Society has been successful in designing the DEWATS systems and bringing them to practice in several buildings, housing societies, townships, offices, educational institutions and rural communities. These systems have also been implemented for waterbody rejuvenation by providing a diversion channel for the sewage water and the rainwater to enter the DEWATS natural wastewater treatment system. The DEWATS have wide acceptance because of their low maintenance factor.
Nature based holistic waterbody rejuvenation, Coimbatore
India’s first Eco-restoration of 9 lakes, Coimbatore
According to Kirti, it is important to highlight the monitoring of wastewater treatment systems. from the water first collected from the communities being served and then taken to the plant for treatment to the collection pipes that often get eroded due to high pollutant concentration and sometimes even break due to the pressure of some unwanted substances in the water. If this data is collected over time and the lifetime of particular unit is determined through some matrices, then monitoring activities can be devised and sensors can be put in place to detect any damage caused. Machine learning methods alias computational techniques can be used to figure out the assessment and management by analysing the data. Thus, if the data input happens regularly, utility companies can easily monitor the need for maintenance rather than adopting a reactionary approach post-damage.
The low maintenance cost in the absence of large machines in the system that need service or repair has been the ultimate selling point of the NbS approach. There is absolutely zero maintenance required for the system daily. Based on how it is designed, the primary and secondary treatments/chambers need maintenance in few years for cleaning of the sludge accumulated at the bottom. The tertiary treatment, being based on the capacity of fibrous plants to absorb nutrients from the water, also does not require any heavy maintenance techniques. The filters require maintenance in around 4-5 years when they can be de-clogged to put back into the system after proper cleaning or removed or replaced in extreme condition.
Such decentralised systems will help the cities to reduce the pressure on the sewer lines. For example, the public toilets in the city of Trichy when designed, the underground drainage system was old and not designed to support the additional toilets. Then, the decentralised systems were put to use to help to remove the solid particles from the wastewater generated in the public toilets before discharging the water into the main sewer systems.

Synthesis of Efficient Wastewater Treatment Networks

According to Kirti, efficient wastewater treatment can be well understood and applied through Process Systems Engineering (PSE). The PSE provides meaningful insights into environment and sustainability. PSE also helps in analysing the cost-effectiveness of the infrastructure and the services. PSE is an interdisciplinary field of engineering management that focuses on design, integration, and management of complex systems over their life cycles. It encompasses multiple directions including data analysis, mathematical modelling, process design and operation, process control, optimization and risk analysis with quantification methods.
The treatment of wastewater varies considerably depending on its quantity, source as well as the concentration of contaminants. Since, wastewater is generated from multiple sources and varies greatly in the constituent contaminants. For example, the effluent produced by a food processing industry might contain large volumes of starch or food colouring substances while a pharmaceutical industry will have wastewater filled with pharmaceutical ingredients or hazardous solvents.
There are multiple options available for the treatment of wastewater, however matching the wastewater with the correct and most appropriate solution techniques remains a challenge. This is where appropriate solution requires PSE to design the best possible treatment process. The PSE design is a complex method as the number of possibilities increase with the number of contaminants present in the water and the number of technologies available for each task. For example, even when there are only 5 contaminants with 10 technologies for each task, there will be too many possible networks as shown in the figure below.
Not every network will be feasible as it will not help to reach the desired purity level or meet the required guidelines. Among the feasible networks too, some will be more cost-effective than others.
Thus, it is observed that wastewater treatment is most effective by using a stage-wise approach. Using this idea, the approach of a graph can be applied to the treatment. The P-graph (process graph) approach is based on simple graph theory which includes a set of nodes and vertices and based on certain axioms that the P-graph follows. It is a unique bipartite graph representing the structure of a process system with the operating units are denoted by horizontal bars, and their input and output materials by solid circles. It is a directed graph; the direction of the arcs is the direction of the material flows in the network; it is directed to an operating unit from its input materials and from an operating unit to its output materials.
It is a framework that uses vertices and nodes to represent materials and operating units connected by arcs. There are mainly two types of nodes - M Type which includes the materials such as raw materials, products and intermediaries; and O Type which includes operating units. Each of these nodes comprises some unique properties, for example, raw materials will not have any input going into it but will have the output arc leaving it. Similarly, the product will only have an output arc and it will be a terminal node. The operating units which are represented by horizontal bars are the technologies and, in these technologies, it also provides detailed insights on costs as well as some non-intuitive solutions can be obtained for sustainability.
Among the available networks to determine the structural feasibility, certain properties help to find which networks are more feasible as compared to the others. This is done based on certain algorithms. The various available algorithms for this purpose include Maximal Structure Generator (MSG), Solution Structure Generator (SSG) and Accelerated Branch and Bound (ABB).
Based on the contaminants of the sewage water, their inlet amount, and their required concentration in the pure stream, the maximal structure generator captures the maximum possibilities of technologies and processes to be used in the treatment of process. For example, in Figure below, the first stage of treatment involves 7 potential nodes with 8 operations and the next stage of treatment includes 18 such operations.
Constructing a Maximal Structure
Thus, the overall methodology of the P-Graph approach first involves the identification of the contaminants to model the wastewater treatment problem such as, solid, water, chemicals, metal, etc. It then formulates the input stream composition and the targets of the final product (output stream). Based on the above, the plausible technologies for withdrawing the pollutant materials are listed for each stage of separation. This structure is constructed in a stage-wise manner, starting with primary treatment operations and replicating the subsequent stages for each specific path. Finally, the ABB algorithm helps to determine the optimal and near-optimal structures by considering factors such as, cost, sustainability, and more.
P-graph Formulation
The ability of computational methods and P-graph axioms helps to solve the problem of electing the best possible wastewater treatment method within minutes. Parametric studies also help to determine the sensitivity of the given optimal method. So, if there is variation in the composition of the wastewater or the output chemical limits change then the graph can be modified accordingly. Similarly, the cost index can be replaced by a Sustainability Process Index (SPI). The SPI is the ecological footprint of a product or service unit divided by the statistical area per person. It indicates how much of the natural income a person is entitled to and how much is consumed to provide this product or service via the technical process undergoing assessment. In nutshell, the P-graph approach is an integrated approach involving design and optimization for the generation of cost-effective wastewater treatment networks and is one of the best available methods to determine complex decisions on sustainability concerns.

Discussion

Working with nature-based techniques in times when a lot of scientific methods are available to people is crucial of decentralised systems. Despite several scientific technologies available to people, nature-based systems have gained good attention since the beginning of the century when few NbS practitioners, like Andrews, were proactively involved in orientation programs on decentralised systems to make them popular. Still, it is required to conduct training workshops to bring more engineers into the practice and encourage them to work towards its implementation. Since, now such decentralised solutions are applied at a city-wide level where households, resorts and educational buildings are preferring to go for such simple systems for their easy operations and lower costs.
To focus on our core businesses, we often neglect the environmental damage being caused. Improper treatment of wastewater is one such issue where the polluted water is allowed to flow into the waterbodies without enough treatment. The session highlighted that a sophisticated monitoring system with simple basic ecosystem approach can save time, cost and energy and also provide an alternative way of treating sewage through minimal operational costs. Thus, keeping up the aim of enhancing water conversations, the session brought out the current problems plaguing the wastewater treatment systems presenting an alternate path towards a sustainable future.
---
*Independent scholars and Fellow at ED(R)C Ahmedabad and WforW Foundation. **Entrepreneur, researcher, educator, speaker, mentor. Environmental Design Consultants, Ahmedabad and WforW Foundation (www.mansee.in and www.wforw.in)
***
Wednesdays.for.Water is an initiative of the WforW Foundation, a think tank, built as a Citizens Collective. The idea of Wednesdays.for.Water is to connect the water worries and wisdom with the water warriors through dialogues/discussions/debates. The objective is to get in conversations with policy makers, practitioners, researchers, academicians besides the youth towards water conservation and management. The other team members of WforW are, Dr. Fawzia Tarannum (Climate Reality India), Prof. Bibhu P Nayak (TISS-Hyd), Ganesh Shankar and Vasantha Subbiah (FluxGen-Blr), Garbhit Naik, Monica Tewari, Harshita Sehgal, Monami Bhattacharya, Anubhuti Shekhar (ED(R)C-Ahmd), Vandana Tiwari, and counting. The Wednesdays.for.Water is reachable at wednesdays.for.water@gmail.com and WforW Foundation is reachable at hellowforw@gmail.com and hello@wforw.in. The WforW Foundation social media are reachable at InstagramFacebookTwitterLinkedIn

Comments

Insightful content! I share the same view.


Our Water Treatment RO Plants stand as paragons of excellence in purifying water for various applications. Harnessing the power of advanced technology, we redefine the standards of water treatment, ensuring purity, safety, and sustainability.

TRENDING

हिंदी आलोचना जैसे पिछड़ चुके अनुशासन की जगह हिंदी वैचारिकी का विकास जरूरी

- प्रमोद रंजन*   भारतीय राजनीति में सांप्रदायिक व प्रतिक्रियावादी ताकतों को सत्ता तक पहुंचाने में हिंदी पट्टी का सबसे बड़ा योगदान है। इसका मुख्य कारण हिंदी-पट्टी में कार्यरत समाजवादी व जनपक्षधर हिरावल दस्ते का विचारहीन, अनैतिक और  प्रतिक्रियावादी होते जाना है। अगर हम उपरोक्त बातों को स्वीकार करते हैं, तो कुछ रोचक निष्कर्ष निकलते हैं। हिंदी-जनता और उसके हिरावल दस्ते को विचारहीन और प्रतिक्रियावादी बनने से रोकने की मुख्य ज़िम्मेदारी किसकी थी?

नफरती बातें: मुसलमानों में असुरक्षा का भाव बढ़ रहा है, वे अपने मोहल्लों में सिमट रहे हैं

- राम पुनियानी*  भारत पर पिछले 10 सालों से हिन्दू राष्ट्रवादी भारतीय जनता पार्टी (भाजपा) राज कर रही है. भाजपा आरएसएस परिवार की सदस्य है और आरएसएस का लक्ष्य है हिन्दू राष्ट्र का निर्माण. आरएसएस से जुड़ी सैंकड़ों संस्थाएँ हैं. उसके लाखों, बल्कि शायद, करोड़ों स्वयंसेवक हैं. इसके अलावा कई हजार वरिष्ठ कार्यकर्ता हैं जिन्हें प्रचारक कहा जाता है. भाजपा के सत्ता में आने के बाद से आरएसएस दुगनी गति से हिन्दू राष्ट्र के निर्माण के अपने एजेण्डे को पूरा करने में जुट गया है. यदि भाजपा को चुनावों में लगातार सफलता हासिल हो रही है तो उसका कारण है देश में साम्प्रदायिकता और साम्प्रदायिक मुद्दों का बढ़ता बोलबाला. इनमें से कुछ हैं राम मंदिर, गौमांस और गोवध एवं लव जिहाद. 

देशव्यापी ग्रामीण भारत बंध में उतरे मध्य प्रदेश के आदिवासी, किया केंद्र सरकार का विरोध

- हरसिंग जमरे, भिखला सोलंकी, रतन अलावे*  15 और 16 फरवरी को निमाड के बड़वानी, खरगोन और बुरहानपुर में जागृत आदिवासी दलित संगठन के नेतृत्व में आदिवासी महिला-पुरुषों ग्रामीण भारत बंद में रैली एवं विरोध प्रदर्शन किया । प्रधान मंत्री द्वारा 2014 में फसलों की लागत का डेढ़ गुना भाव देने का वादा किया गया था, 2016 में किसानों की आय दुगना करने का वादा किया गया था । आज, फसलों का दाम नहीं बढ़ रहा है, लेकिन खेती में खर्च बढ़ता जा रहा है! खाद, बीज और दवाइयों का दाम, तीन-चार गुना बढ़ चुका है! किसानों को लागत का डेढ़ गुना भाव देने के बजाए, खेती को कंपनियों के हवाले करने के लिए 3 काले कृषि कानून लाए गए । 3 काले कानून वापस लेते समय प्रधान मंत्री ने फिर वादा किया था कि फसलों की लागत का डेढ़ गुना भाव की कानूनी गारंटी के लिए कानून बनाएँगे, लेकिन वो भी झूठ निकला! आज जब देश के किसान दिल्ली में आपको अपना वादा याद दिलाने आए है, तब आप उनका रास्ता रोक रहें है, उनके साथ मारपीट कर उन पर आँसू गैस फेंक रहें हैं, उन पर छर्रों से फायरिंग कर रहें है! देश को खिलाने वाला किसान खुद भूखा रहे, क्या यही विकास है?

આદર્શ સાંસદ ગ્રામ યોજના ના 106 દત્તક ગામો પૈકી કોઈ પણ ગામનું સોશ્યલ ઓડિટ થયું નથી

- પંક્તિ જોગ  આદર્શ સાંસદ ગ્રામ યોજના  ઓકટોબર 2014 થી અમલ માં છે. આ યોજનાં મૂજબ 2019-2024 દરમ્યાન ગુજરાત ના 26 સાંસદોએ 130 ગામો દત્તક લેવાના થતા હતાં. 

હું બહુજન સમાજ પાર્ટીથી ચૂંટણી લડ્યો. મારા કડવા અનુભવ: સુરતનાં બનાવોના પરિપ્રેક્ષ્યમાં

- વાલજીભાઈ પટેલ  બહુજન સમાજ પાર્ટીના સુરતના બનાવ પછી પાર્ટીના લાગણીશીલ નિરાશ યુવા મિત્રોને માર્ગદર્શન મળે તે માટે મેં અનુભવેલો કડવો પ્રસંગ લખવો મને જરૂરી લાગે છે. એટલે લખી રહ્યો છું. આમ તો મને લખવાની આદત નથી. હું તો લડનાર માણસ છું.

ગુજરાતના ૮૬૧ અકસ્માતે મૃત્યુ પામ્યા બાંધકામ કામદારોમાં થી ૪૩ ટકા પરિવારોને જ સહાય મળી

- વિપુલ પંડયા*  વિશ્વમાં ખાણ, બાંધકામ, કૃષિ, વનસંવર્ધન, માછીમારી અને ઉત્પાદન એ સૌથી જોખમી ક્ષેત્રો છે. ખાણ ઉધોગ પછી સૌથી વધુ અકસ્માતો બાંધકામ ક્ષેત્રમાં નોંધાઈ રહ્યા છે. ILO ના નવેમ્બર ૨૦૨૩ ના અહેવાલ મુજબ વિશ્વમાં બાંધકામમાં દર વર્ષે ૩૦ લાખ કામદારો મૃત્યુ પામે છે જેમાં ૨.૬ મિલિયન મૃત્યુ કામ સંબંધીત રોગો અને ૩૩૦૦૦૦ મૃત્યુ કામના સ્થળે થતા જીવલેણ અકસ્માતોને આભારી છે. જે ૨૦૧૫ ની સરખામણીમાં ૫ ટકાથી વધુનો વધારો છે એવું ILO નો અભ્યાસ દર્શાવે છે.

Under Modi, democracy is regressing and economy is also growing slowly

By Avyaan Sharma*   India is "the largest democracy in the world", but now its democracy is regressing and its economy is also growing slowly. What has PM Modi's ten years in power brought us? Unemployment remains high. Joblessness is particularly high among India's youth - with those aged 15 to 29 making up a staggering 83% of all unemployed people in India, according to the "India Employment Report 2024", published last month by the International Labour Organisation (ILO) and the Institute of Human Development (IHD). The BJP-led government did not provide jobs to two crore youth in a year as was promised by Modi in the run up to the 2014 general elections.

Opposition parties appear to have fallen into the trap of Modi-centric elections

By NS Venkataraman*                                          As India is now passing through parliamentary election with more than 950 million   citizens having right to exercise their franchise,  what is unique about this election is the widely believed foregone conclusion that Mr. Narendra Modi would win the election. As a matter of fact, most people do not say that BJP,   the party that Mr. Modi belongs to,  would win the election but restrict themselves to say that Mr. Modi would win the election.  

મોદીનો દાયકો: વિદેશી દેવામાં ભારે વધારો, જંગી વિદેશી રોકાણ; સ્વદેશી જાગરણ મંચ કુંભકર્ણ બન્યો

- પ્રો. હેમંતકુમાર શાહ  ૨૦૧૪માં ભારતનું વિદેશી દેવું ૪૬,૨૦૦ કરોડ ડોલર હતું અને તે ૨૦૨૪ સુધીમાં વધીને ૬૪,૦૦૦ કરોડ ડોલર થયું છે. આમ તેમાં ૩૮ ટકાનો વધારો થયો છે. આ રકમ આજના ડોલરના ભાવે ₹ ૫૪.૪૦ લાખ કરોડ થાય. એ ભારત સરકારના ૪૭ લાખ કરોડ રૂપિયાના બજેટ કરતાં પણ વધારે થઈ! 

Laxmanpur Bathe massacre: Perfect example of proto-fascist Brahmanical social order

By Harsh Thakor  The massacre at Laxmanpur-Bathe of Jehanabad in Bihar on the night of 1 December in 1997 was a landmark event with distinguishing features .The genocide rightly shook the conscience of the nation in the 50th year of Indian independence. The scale of the carnage was unparalleled in any caste massacre. It was a perfect manifestation of how in essence the so called neo-liberal state was in essence most autocratic.